Monthly Archives: April 2013

Ebooks and Self-Publishing

One of the major changes that has come with the rising popularity of ebooks has been self-publishing.  Many authors are bypassing the traditional route of using agents, editors, and publishing houses in favor of self-publishing.  One recently famous example of this new trend is with the controversial Fifty Shades trilogy.  The wikipedia article on self-publishing outlines the advantages and disadvantages of self-publishing.  This article focuses on some of the positive aspects of self-publishing, such as price and diversity, based on its recent success and popularity.

What do you think of self-publishing?  It is helping or hurting the publishing industry, the quality of literature today?  If you were a writer, would you self-publish?

Ebooks: Just Another Book

I know an awful lot of people who think strongly one way or the other on the debate of e-books vs. print books: which is better to read? Most of my friends are conservatives on this issue: they prefer the printed book citing arguments of sentimental nostalgia. They like to curl up with a book, draw in their margins, and smell them. On the other hand, my friends who like e-books favor the new technology for its convenience and low cost. My novelist friend enjoys the ability to quickly send and receive drafts to peer edit, creating an effective virtual community.

Though you may see yourself on one side or the other, I believe that both sides find common ground in what they look for in the reading experience. Those who covet ebooks are not looking for an experience wholly different from reading print books. One study finds that most people favor an interface that mimics the print book design.  We tend to enjoy ebooks that relive the familiarity of print books, which at this time, about everyone living considers the default. However, the added bells and whistles of ebooks are attractive. The ability to search and reach any point in the text immediately is invaluable to a researcher. Possibilities to quickly open apps like dictionaries are also valuable. Though ebooks offer these new applications, I believe the presentation will resemble its print father for a long time.

Read a book… earn money

After I read the blog prompt I coincidently stumbled upon a blog post about a possible future of ebooks. On his blog, Seth Godin wrote today about Amazons next kindle to be released to the public: the Kindle Zero. Why is it called zero? It will be free to amazon prime members. If only it were true… it is however a pretty plausible April fools joke. Many people retweeted Godin in full belief that kindle zero was a real thing.

The second interesting news in the blog was the potential cash reward given by Random House and Wiley to read books. (Not an april fools joke) This would be applied to 10% of their books that were previously free. Read a book and earn money. The ebook would use some program to tell if the reader read the book and didn’t just flip through it or scroll to the end. The chart below demonstrates how publishers would actually profit from this:  explained by this site

Pay To Read

Parodies: Pony Fabulous

Today, I saw a very well done parody video of one of Taylor Swift’s new songs. After watching, I thought of its implications in terms of copyright, and decided that this video indeed fell under fair use. The purpose of the work is purely entertainment. Since this entertainment is geared, I suspect, to an audience who generally dislikes Swift, the effect on the original song’s potential market is null. With two of the four factors of fair use checked off, I would like to bring a bit of my frenemy Goldstein into this discussion. As noted from his discussion of software protection under copyright, copyright does not protect the method or process of a text, only its expression (191). The creator of this video certainly does not replicate Swift’s expression of her song, since he changes the lyrics entirely and score slightly; his message/theme is entirely different from hers. The sound itself can be thought of as the process: copying that is perfectly legal.

Only a few minutes after thinking of this blog post, I remembered another parody video of a different nature. This video was made by a TV station in order to promote its own show. Since I’m running out of space, I want to consider if this economic element changes the argument for fair use. What makes Equestria Girls different from I Knew Gary Was Trouble? Do they fall under the same or different cases of fair use?

Why Socially Acceptable to Pirate Music?

The one part of the clip from the sweet spot that really struck me was when they were talking about how the music world has changed drastically over the years. The one man mentioned how he once did a story on The Drive By Truckers and they said, “thank god people can’t download t-shirts.” This was really eye opening to me, as I’ve never fathomed something like that. In our society people just don’t do that. But when you think about it, it’s the same concept as pirating music from the internet. In both cases, your are stealing something illegally. For some reason in our society however, stealing music has become a norm that people don’t think twice about. And if anything people who actually pay for the  songs they have are in the minority. It’s a sad thought to ponder that we are a generation of people that have grown so accustomed to a specific type of theft. The music world has suffered from this and the book world has suffered and will continue to suffer from this with the influx of E-books. Should clothing companies be worried that they are next- that one day someone may find a way to actually download clothing?