Monthly Archives: March 2013

Prompt: Copyright Lawsuit

A Copyright Lawsuit regarding the Playing of music can be summarized by 3 quotes:

“In early December, publishing rights organization Broadcast Music Inc. (BMI) sued Mallonn’s Grill & Bar in Canton, Ohio, for allegedly playing music by Kid Rock, Dave Grohl, and other licensed artists without paying royalties.”

“In November, BMI filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against a Lewiston, Idaho, sports bar that was allegedly playing music by Taylor Swift and other BMI-affiliated artists.”

“The celebrities involved drew attention to both cases even though BMI—not the artists themselves—initiated the lawsuits.”

I didnt even know an establishment needed permission to simply play other artist’s music.  This is just ridiculous: music is meant to be heard.  Goldstein wouldnt be very pleased with this news.  In fact, Goldstein states, “Sometimes im tempted to suggest that any song that has sold more than a million copies ought to go directly into the public domain, as if the fans have ransomed it from the copyright holders.”  Now im no music professional but im pretty sure artists like Kid Rock and Taylor Swift have sold over a million copies and are almost immorally wealthy.  Goldstein would certainly disagree with both of these cases especially because the lawsuits were initiated by BMI and not the artists themselves.

Arabian Nights

I cant believe the actors used improv in the middle of an actual play.  I feel like I would end up saying something completely ridiculous and make it more awkward than the prolonged makeout scene.  Its also interesting to think about the ownership of those words once they leave the actors mouth.  I couldnt see actors ever possessing much owner ship over improv lines especially since they aren’t documented.  They might not want to think of anything too witty or they could end up watching a play with their own lines.

Arabian Nights

Wednesday’s presentation of Arabian Nights surprised me, both with the skill of the actors and the overall production. It was obvious that a great amount of work came to bringing this script to life. Not only was the set elaborate and the acting superb, but the story itself was an interesting and entertaining one. What I was particularly impressed by was the storytelling method, where stories were occurring within other stories. I had previously encountered this method in books, but have never sen it done live on a stage before. The actors did an excellent job with utilizing this method. Not only was there a natural flow to this story development, but everything was clear and I never found myself lost. I am very happy I attended this performance, as it opened my mind up to diferent methods of storytelling.

Today’s Class

Today’s discussion was particularly interesting in the way that people linked the play Arabian Nights to what we have been discussing recently. When I viewed the play on Wednesday, I was primarily focusing on the story, and wasn’t thinking about how the play relates to the issue of copyright laws. However, now it is easy to see how the two are related. Of particular interest to me was the discussion of the improv. part of the play, where the class came to the consensus that this particular scene would actually be owned by the actors themselves. Intricacies such as these are what made this discussion particularly insightful.

Blog Prompt – Week 6

A recent event has come up that is related to what has been discussed both in class and the readings involving copyright. The event involves a further continuation of the efforts being made to enforce copyright laws and limit fair use over the internet. Just this past week the newly formed Center for Copyright Information (CCI) announced the release of the Copyright Alert System. The goal of this program is to severely limit the act of piracy online. Essentially, this program sends warning emails to people who the CCI has determined have committed copyright fraud. These emails serve not only to warn people, but also to educate on what is and isn’t acceptable. If an individual gets repeated offenses, the CCi can enact penalties on them, which include slowing internet speeds or temporarily reducing internet access. Many are concerned over this development, and rightly so. It seems as if this program could potentially strike another blow to the campaign for fair use over the internet. It will be interesting to monitor this program in the near future to see what the effects of it are.

http://www.billboard.com/biz/articles/1550750/guest-post-will-the-copyright-alert-system-break-the-internet-by-future-of

Copyright School

After watching the youtube videos in class on tuesday, I became curious about YouTube’s copyright policies. I have seen videos taken down before because of copyright infringement, but never really thought about what happened to the YouTube user who put the content up. According to an article on Politico, If a Youtube recieves a copyright notification about a user’s video then not only will the the video be blocks but the user will have to complete “YouTube Copyright School”.

What is “YouTube Copyright School”? This video:

Not surprisingly this video has over 3 million views. It has a lot of down ratings and comments have been disabled. After you watch the video you have to pass a quiz to prove that you understand copyright law. If you pass the quiz then you can remove the strike from your account.

What do you think of YouTube Copyright School? Is it the right approach?

 

Girl On Fire Case

Alicia Keys has recently been targeted in a copyright lawsuit involving her new song, “Girl On Fire.” It is claimed to have included a mere “two seconds” of material from the Eddie Holman’s song entitled, “Hey There Lonely Girl.” To me, this is absurd as the two songs sound nothing alike. If so many artists can get away with using the same chord sequence (mentioned in my previous blog post), how is Alicia Keys at fault?

This case seems to go along with what Vaidhyanathan was arguing for in the epilogue we read for class today. He claims, “Isn’t copyright supposed to encourage art?…Instead, copyright protection seems to be squelching beauty, impeding exposure, stifling creativity” (Vaidhyanathan 185). Even though the song that Keys has produced is completely different from Holman’s song, it seems to be on the chopping block due to copyright laws. Having listened to these two songs, being aware of this copyright case, I have tried to find evidence for Holman’s case. However, I couldn’t make any connections. I would never have guessed that these two songs were related had I not become aware of this through reading the above article. Thus, in this case, copyright seems to be overstepping its bounds.

4 Chords

This blog post was sparked by a quote from Brian’s blog post: “I have thought about this before. What if in 3000 years, every single possible combination of musical notes has been put together, so there would not be any more original music. What would copyright laws do then?”

At my high school, once a year, we put on a Coffeehouse Show-where people would perform short skits, or songs of whatever kind. One year, some students got up and began singing individual songs, but what was interesting about them was that they all had had the same basic 4 chords to them, much like in this video. In the music world, this does not seem to violate copyright laws. For example in the video, Journey is not given credit for the songs made after it that include the same 4 chords as it uses. However, in the writing world, one can not just take others’ words and get away with it. Each of the songs, although they incorporate the same four chords, are all given credit to be original works. I wonder why this works the way it does?