Pathogen Pollution

The article about the White Nose Syndrome (WNS) brings up a good point about the introduction of diseases via human trade or travel from Europe. The bats are dying from the WNS disease that compromises their ability to store fat during hibernation seasons. This disease did not originate in the US, but is having a huge effect on bats in North America.

In class we have talked a lot about invasive plants, but not as much on invasive diseases. Ever since settlers came to the Americas they have brought diseases with them such as small pox. These diseases were deadly to the Native Americans who had no ability to fight off these infectious diseases because their immune systems had never been exposed to these kinds of pathogens.

International trade has always been seen as a good thing between friendly nations, but it can have deadly consequences. When things are shipped to the US or other countries, they not only bring their goods, but also their diseases, insects, and seeds.

This video gives a pretty good synopsis on the impact of invasive species if you’re not as familiar on the subject. It also talks about what implications climate change will have on invasive species, check it out!

Pretty Gross, Eh?

In 2015, it’s hard to imagine that a fully developed city in North America would be willing to dump billions of gallons of untreated sewage into their waters. Well… it’s happening. Starting on Wednesday, the Canadian city of Montreal will begin releasing nearly 2.1 billion gallons of raw sewage into the St. Lawrence River. City officials claim that there is no alternative in the matter, as the sewage must be released in order to complete construction of a new highway for the city.

Although I have no engineering background and little information on this story, I wonder if there truly were no alternatives to this situation? It will be interesting, and probably unsettling to see what the environmental impacts of this decision will be.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/montreal-sewage-dump-to-begin-wednesday-1447182904

 

 

Gendered Nature

Today in class we talked about gendered nature in the context of Hemingway’s, “The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber” and how it applies to social perceptions of hunting and masculinity. Shortly following class I watched a quick episode of That 70’s Show, which is, for those unfamiliar, a show from the early 2000s about a group of friends in the 1970s. It specifically focuses on the Forman family, comprised of lead role Eric, his veteran father Red, and his nurse mother Kitty.

In this particular episode, the “men” of the show go deer hunting. Eric’s girlfriend, who is often depicted as more “masculine” or “tough” than Eric, wants to go, but is told to stay behind with the women. Naturally, the women are shown gossiping and playing with each others hair (and as the afternoon rolls on, playing cards and drinking wine). Also naturally, the men are engaged in a struggle for top dog in their adventure to the woods. Perhaps the central scene of the episode revolves around Eric and Red perched on a platform scouting for deer. When Red spots a buck, he “gives the kill” so to speak, to Eric. Eric misses, and Red spends a good amount of time chastising him for his inadequacy as a man, citing his own military success as an indicator of masculine dominance over his son. Eric is often criticized on the show for being delicate or weak, and in this case, it was by his father for not being manly enough to have the hunting skills to kill a deer.

A while after the missed shot, Eric points to a soda can far away and shoots it cleanly, much to Red’s surprise. Eric explains that he hadn’t missed the deer, he simply hadn’t wanted to kill it. He demonstrates his appreciation for nature as the reason for not killing a living being. This is interesting because in this instance, he needs to justify his manhood by citing  a personal connection to something that defies traditional masculinity.

Inspiring Bird Banding

As Jeremy mentioned in class today, last week in conservation biology for lab we went to Jacobsburg state park and witnessed bird banding. The activity was very interesting and surprisingly simple. Brad, the man running the lab, set up 3 special nets for catching birds and then we waited. Over the course of 3 hours, 6 birds were caught, examined, banded, and released. The process itself and the Brad knowledge about the birds was interesting, but what truly impacted me about the lab was the amount of time and effort Brad spent birdbanding in his normal life. He had a full time job working in the easton area but also spent time every weekend banding birds. Brad found something he was passionate about and has devoted time, money, and energy into that passion. If more passion can be generated about nature maybe more will follow in Brad’s footsteps. IMG_3547 IMG_3553

IMG_3540

Quotes of Interest

“The naming of things is a useful mnemonic dcvia, enabling us to distinguish and utilize and remember what otherwise might remain an undifferentiated sensory blur, but I don’t think names tell us much of character, essence, meaning.” (Abbey 50)

“The earth is not a mere fragment of dead history, stratum upon stratum like the leaves of a book, to be studied by geologists and antiquaries chiefly, but living poetry like the leaves of a tree, which precede flowers and fruit, -not a fossil earth, but a living earth; compared with whose great central life all animal and vegetable life is merely parasitic” (Walden 334)

Passages

“They are not even faintly shy. They are everywhere, in treetops and on the ground. Their song reminds me of a child’s neighborhood rallying cry — ee-ock-ee — with a heartfelt warble at the end. But it is their call that is especially endearing. The  towhee had the brass and grace to call, simply and clearly, “tweet.” I know of no other bird that stoops to literal tweeting”(Dillard 252).

“A kind of nothing is what I wish to accomplish, a singleminded trek towards that place where ant shutter left open to the zenith at night will record the wheeling of all the sky’s stars as a pattern of perfect, concentric circles. I seek a reduction, a shedding, a sloughing off”(Dillard 255).

“But to me the most mysterious thing about the universe is not its comprehensibility but the fact that it exists. And the same mystery attaches to everything within it. The world is permeated through and through by mystery. By the incomprehensible… But this knowledge adds not much to our understanding of things. “Knowledge is power,”… But power does not lead to wisdom, even less to understanding… This blather about mystery is probably no more than a confession of intellectual laziness”(Abbey 51).

“I respect vultures myself, even like them, I guess, in a way, and fully expect someday to join them, internally at least. One should plan one’s reincarnation with care. I like especially the idea of floating among the clouds all day, seldom stirring a feather, meditating in whatever it is that vultures meditate about. It looks like a good life, from down here” (Abbey 53).

Points of Interest

“I stood under tulips and ashes, maples, sour wood, sassafras,
locusts, catalpas, and oaks. I let my eyes spread and unfix, screening
out all that was not vertical motion, and I saw only leaves in the
air–or rather, since my mind was also unfixed, vertical mils of yellow
color-patches idling hm nowhere to nowhere. Mysterious
streamers of color unrolled silently all about me, distant and near.
Some color chips made the descent violently; they wrenched from
side to side in a series of diminishing swings, as if wildly fighting
the fall with all the tricks of keel and ghde they could muster.
Others spun straight down in tight, suicidal circles.” (Dillard, 249)

-reminded me of when we went out to look at leaves and my thought process

“The naming of things is a useful mnemonic device, enabling
us to distinguish and utilize and remember what otherwise might
remain an undifferentiated sensory blur, but I don’t think names
tell us much of character, essence, meaning. Einstein thought that
the most mysterious aspect of the universe (if it is, indeed, a universe,
not a pluri-verse) is what he called its “comprehensibility.” (Watching the Birds, 50)

-interesting to see this compare/contrast between science and nature

Dwelling, by Linda Hogan

Linda Hogan

Dwellings

Not far from where I live is a hill that was cut into by the moving water of a creek. Eroded this way, all that’s left of it is a broken wall of earth that contains old roots and pebbles woven together and exposed. Seen from a distance, it is only a rise of raw earth. But up close it is something wonderful, a small cliff dwelling that looks almost as intricate and well made as those the Anasazi left behind when they vanished mysteriously centuries ago. This hill is a place that could be the starry skies at night turned inward into the thousand round holes where solitary bees have lived and died. It is a hill of tunneling rooms. At the mouths of some of the excavations, half-circles of clay beetle out like awnings shading a doorway. It is earth that was turned to clay in the mouths of the bees and spit out as they mined deeper into their dwelling places.

This place is where the bees reside at an angle safe from rain. It faces the southern sun. It is a warm and intelligent architecture of memory, learned by whatever memory lives in the blood. Many of the holes still contain gold husks of dead bees, their faces dry and gone, their flat eyes gazing out from death’s land toward the other uninhabited half of the hill that is across the creek from the catacombs.

The first time I found the residence of the bees, it was dusty summer. The sun was hot, and land was the dry color of rust. Now and then a car rumbled along the dirt road and dust rose up behind it before settling back down on older dust. In the silence, the bees made a soft droning hum. They were alive then, and working the hill, going out and returning with pollen , in and out through the holes, back and forth between daylight and the cooler, darker regions of the inner earth. They were flying an invisible map charted by landmarks, the slant of light, and a circling story they told one another about the direction of food held inside the center of yellow flowers.

Sitting in the hot sun, watching the small bees fly in and out around the hill, hearing the summer birds, the light breeze, I felt right in the world. I belonged there. I thought of my own dwelling places, those real and those imagined. Once I lived in a town called Manitou, which means “Great Spirit”, and where hot mineral springwater gurgled beneath the streets and rose into open wells. I felt safe there. With the underground movement of water and heat a constant reminder of other life, of what lives beneath us, it seemed to be the center of the world.

A few years after that, I wanted silence. My daydreams were full of places I longed to be, shelters and solitudes. I wanted a room apart from others, a hidden cabin to rest in. I wanted to be in a redwood forest with trees so tall the owls called out in the daytime. I daydreamed of living in a vapor cave a few hours away from here. Underground, warm, and moist, I thought it would be the perfect world or staying out of cold winter, for escaping the noise of living.

And how often I’ve wanted to escape to a wilderness where a human hand has not been in everything. But those were only dreams of peace, of comfort, of a nest inside stone or woods, a sanctuary where a dream or life wouldn’t be invaded.

Years ago, in the next canyon west of here, there was a man who followed one of those dreams and moved into a cave that could only be reached by climbing down a rope. For years the lived there in comfort, like a troglodyte. The inner weather was stable, never too hot, too cold, too wet, or too dry. But then he felt lonely. His utopia needed a woman. He went to town until he found a wife. For a while after the marriage, his wife climbed down the rope along with him, but before long she didn’t want the mice scurrying about in the cave, or the untidy bats that wanted to hang from the stones in the ceiling. So they built a door. Because of the closed entryway, the temperature changed. They had to put in heat. Then the inner moisture of earth warped the door, so they had to have air-conditioning, and after that the earth wanted to go about life in its own way and it didn’t give in to the people.

In other days and places, people paid more attention to the strong-headed will of earth. Once homes were built of wood that had been felled from a single region in a forest. That way, it was thought, the house would hold together more harmoniously, and the family of walls would not fall or lend themselves to the unhappiness or arguments of the inhabitants.

An Italian immigrant to Chicago, Aldo Piacenzi, built birdhouses that were dwellings of harmony and peace. They were the incredible spired shapes of cathedrals in Italy. They housed not only the birds, but also his memories, his own past. He painted them watery blue of his Mediterranean, the wild rose of flowers in a summer field. Inside them was straw and the droppings of lives that laid eggs, fledglings who grew there. What places to inhabit, the bright and sunny birdhouses in dreary alleyways of the city.

One beautiful afternoon, cool and moist, with the kind of yellow light that falls on earth in these regions, I waited for barn swallows to return from their daily work of food gathering. Inside the tunnel where they live, hundreds of swallows had mixed their saliva with mud and clay, much like the solitary bees, and formed nests that were as a potter’s bowl. At five in the evening, they returned all at once, a dark, flying shadow. Despite their enormous numbers and the crowding together of nests, they didn’t pause for even a moment before entering the nests, nor did they crowd one another. Instantly they vanished into the nests. The tunnel went silent. It held no outward signs of life.

But I knew they were there, filled with the fire of living. And what a marriage of elements was in those nests. Not only mud’s earth and water, the fire of sun and dry air, but even the elements contained one another. The bodies of prophets and crazy men were broken down in that soil.

I’ve noticed often how when a house is abandoned, it begins to sag. Without a tenant, it has no need to go on. If it were a person, we’d say it is depressed or lonely. The roof settles in, the paint cracks, the walls and floorboards warp and slope downward in their own natural ways, telling us that life must stay in everything as the world whirls and tilts and moves through boundless space.

One summer day, cleaning up after long-eared owls where I work at a rehabilitation facility for birds of prey, I was raking the gravel floor of a flight cage. Down on the ground, something looked like it was moving. I bent over to look into the pile of bones and pellets I’d just raked together. There, close to the ground, were to fetal mice. They were new to the planet, pink and hairless. They were so tenderly young. Their faces had swollen blue-veined eyes. They were nestles in a mound of feathers, soft as velvet, each one curled up smaller than an infant’s ear, listening to the first sounds of earth. But the ants were biting them. They turned in agony, unable to pull away, not yet having the arms or legs to move, but feeling, twisting away from, the pain of the bites. I was horrified to see them bitten out of life that way. I dipped them in water, as if to take away the sting, and let the ants fall in the bucket. Then I held the tiny mice in the palm of my hand. Some of the ants were drowning in the water. I was trading one life for another, exchanging the lives of the ants for those of mice, but I hated their suffering, and hated even more that they had not yet grown to a life, and already they inhabited the miserable world of pain. Death and life feed each other. I know that.

Inside these rooms where birds are healed, there are other lives besides those of mice. There are fine gray globes the wasps have woven together, the white cocoons of spiders in a corner, the downward tunneling anthills. All these dwellings are inside one small waster space, but I think most about the mice. Sometimes the downy nests fall out of the way of their enemies. When one of the nests falls, they are so well made and soft, woven mostly from the chest feathers of birds. Sometimes the leg of a small quail holds the nest together like a slender cornerstone with dry, bent claws. The mice have adapted to life in the presence of their enemies, adapted to living in the thing wall between beak and beak, claw and claw. They move their nests often, as if a new rafter or wall will protect them from the inevitable fate of all our returns home to the deeper, wider nests of earth that houses us all.

One August at Zia Pueblo during the old corn dance I noticed tourists picking up shards of all the old pottery that had been made and broken there. The residents of Zia know not to take the bowls and pots left behind by the older ones. They know that the fragments of those earlier lives need to be smoothed back to earth, but younger nations, travelers from continents across the world who have come to inhabit this land, have little of their own to grow on. The pieces of earth that were formed into bowls, even on their way home to dust, provide the new people a lifetime to an unknown land, help them remember that they live in the old nest of earth.

It was in early February, during the mating season of the great horned owl. It was dusk, and I hiked up the back of a mountain to where I’d heard the owls a year before. I wanted to hear them again, the voices so tender, so deep, like a memory of comfort. I was halfway up the trail when I found a soft, round nest. It had fallen from one of the bare-branched trees. It was a delicate nest, woven together of feathers, sage, and strands of wild grass. Holding it in my hand in the rosy twilight, I noticed that a blue thread was entwined with the other gatherings there. I pulled at the thread a little, and then I recognized it. It was a thread from on of my skirts. It was blue cotton. It was the unmistakable color and shape of a pattern I knew. I liked it, that a thread of my life was in an abandoned nest, one that had held eggs and new life. I took the nest home. At home, I held it to the light and looked more closely. There, to my surprise, nestled into the gray-green sage, was a gnarl of black hair. It was also unmistakable. It was my daughter’s hair, cleaned from a brush and picked up out in the sun beneath the maple tree, or the pit cherry where the birds eat the overladen, fertile branches until only the seeds remain on the trees.

I didn’t know what kind of nest it was, or who has lived there. It didn’t matter. I thought of the remnants of our lives carried up the hill that way and turned into shelter. That night, resting inside the walls of our home, the world outside weighed so heavily against the thin wood of the house. The sloped roof was the only thing between us and the universe. Everything outside of our wooden boundaries seemed so large. Filled with the night’s citizens, it all came alive. The world opened in the thickets of the dark. The wild grapes would soon ripen on the vines. The burrowing ones were emerging. Horned owls sat in the treetops. Mice scurried here and there. Skunk, fox, the slow and holy porcupine, all were passing by this way. The young of the solitary bees were feeding on the pollen in the dark. The whole world was a nest on its humble tilt, in the maze of the universe, holding us.

Linda Hogan, a member of the Chickasaw tribe, was born in 1947 in Denver, Colorado. She is an activist in Native American and environmental causes, a poet, playwright, fiction writer, and essayist, and has taught American Indian Studies and English. An important figure in Native American literature, Hogan in her writing makes a strong case for the value of her culture and the contribution that its way of knowing can make to the way we think about our relationship to the natural world. “Dwellings” is from Hogan’s Dwellings: A Spiritual History of the Living World (1995).

Bear and Geese, by N. Scott Momaday

To an Aged Bear

Hold hard this infirmity.

It defines you. You are old.

Now fix yourself in summer,
In thickets of ripe berries,

And venture toward the ridge
Where you were born. Await there

The setting sun. Be alive
To that old conflagration

One more time. Mortality
Is your shadow and your shade.

Translate yourself to spirit;
Be present on your journey.

Keep to the trees and waters.
Be the singing of the soil.

 

Angle of Geese

How shall we adorn
Recognition with our speech?—
Now the dead firstborn
Will lag in the wake of words.

Custom intervenes;
We are civil, something more:
More than language means,
The mute presence mulls and marks.

Almost of a mind,
We take measure of the loss;
I am slow to find
The mere margin of repose.

And one November
It was longer in the watch,
As if forever,
Of the huge ancestral goose.

So much symmetry!—
Like the pale angle of time
And eternity.
The great shape labored and fell.

Quit of hope and hurt,
It held a motionless gaze
Wide of time, alert,
On the dark distant flurry.

“The earth is not a mere fragment of dead history, stratum upon stratum like the leaves of a book, to be studied by geologists and antiquaries chiefly, but living poetry like the leaves of a tree, which precede flowers and fruit, -not a fossil earth, but a living earth; compared with whose great central life all animal and vegetable life is merely parasitic” (Walden 334). 

This is a concrete, explicit statement of a concept that has been implied in the rest of the book. In my opinion, it is one of the more meaningful take-aways from Walden because it is easy to forget about that which lies under grass, trees, and bodies of water and anyone who wishes to understand the environment must also understand and appreciate the dynamism of underground. It also includes an interesting and somewhat aggravating note that animal and vegetable life is “parasitic.” This seems to contrast with much of the rest of the book because Thoreau overwhelmingly describes the plants and animals around him as positive forces. The word “parasitic” implies just the opposite.

“The naming of things is a useful mnemonic device, enabling us to distinguish and utilize and remember what otherwise might remain an undifferentiated sensory blur, but I don’t think names tell us much of character, essence, meaning” (Abbey 50). 

Abbey concisely describes his opinion about a concept with which I have been wrestling for quite some time. After much thinking and reading, this is essentially the conclusion that I have adopted. I’m glad this opinion has Abbey’s endorsement.