Talk About… Climate Change

On my way back to school yesterday, I was thrilled to see people with banners on the overpasses in Massachusetts on I90 calling for talk about climate change! The first one said “Talk About” with waves painted under it, and the second said “Climate Change” and I believe it had trees around it. There were a few cyclists at each spot smiling and standing by the banners. I was excited to see this so close to home and on a route that sees a TON of traffic from people coming or coming from New England for the holiday.

I also saw that in Paris, climate activists were going to have a march calling for strong climate action but were asked not to march because it was deemed unsafe by city officials. So instead of physically marching, they symbolically laid out a pair of shoes for each person who was supposed to participate in order to demonstrate the magnitude of the interested persons.

 

I look forward to seeing more of this and what will come at the closing of COP21.

Weather and Warmth

So it is no secret to anyone that I live in New Hampshire. As such I have been up North in this beautiful homeland of mine for break. However, it has been a confusing visit home due in part to the fact that it is SO warm here right now! Normally by the end of November there is snow on the ground, and if there isn’t snow, there’s at least a considerable amount of biting wind and frosted plants. But we have none of that. Last night I sat beside an outdoor fire with a group of friends in thin leggings and a flannel with a vest and I was very comfortable. This time last year we tried to do the same and I was bundled in layers with a blanket and we had to go inside early because it was so cold. We were all mystified by the warmth (it was quite literally 65 degrees on Friday…….) already when my friend Zac’s dad came outside to say hello and noted that the TCU vs. Baylor football game was being played in 30 degree rainy weather. In Dallas.

It made the group of us, who are not – other than me – necessarily likely to consider environmental conditions, wonder about how that could be normal. Obviously it isn’t normal, but how will people continue to react to these changes of climate? If we are to be exploring the “cultures of nature” then what exactly is the “culture of weather”? I would say cold winters and snow on the ground (and pretending to enjoy and be tough about both of those things) are integral to the New Hampshire spirit and Northern character. Likewise I would imagine people from Texas appreciate the warmth they get to hold onto into the “winter” months. How would a long term change- if that is what is to come- impact these attitudes and cultures?

Cultures of [swim meet] Nature?

On our field trip, I jokingly suggested to Professor Brandes that we make the swim team’s upcoming meet (on Friday, 6pm, Ruef Natatorium… just sayin’) a field trip to which he jokingly responded that I should figure out how it pertains to nature.

Naturally, while at practice two days later, I gave it some thought, and came up with a few things. Having grown up around lakes and ponds and oceans and pools, I’d never given much thought to how different pools are compared to the other three in their impacts on the environment. Actually, I still don’t really know much about their impacts on the environment, but it has occurred to me with increasing frequency and alarm that they probably aren’t that great. I know that the pool has a filter that cycles mostly the same water through the pools we use here but I also know that the pool and its machinery are quite old and probably not very efficient. I also wonder about the impacts of the chemicals we use to treat the pool and whether or not if we used fewer or different substances to maintain it’s cleanliness, could we use the water in other ways after its life in the pool was over (i.e. agriculture). I have also been observing that with the increased size of our diving team this year (from 3 divers to 7) the amount of hose water used to keep them warm while they wait between dives has dramatically increased. I watch them playing around with the hose in their overflowing kiddie pool and cringe. But does that water get cycled through too?

And what about the air quality, are we polluting the air on Hamilton street every time we open the door? Is the paint coating the walls of a safe quality? Will the upcoming renovations make the pool more efficient or will they harm the campus while they’re in their demolishing and rebuilding?

In a specific meet context especially, there are a number of unsustainable practices that go on in the name of sports without regard to nature. At every meet, there is inevitably an alarming number of plastic water bottles and gatorade bottles that goes around. And coaches tend to have snacks for their athletes, which are generally individually wrapped, bulk-purchased processed snacks. I would be interested in the the amount of waste generated by these events, and how much athletes, coaches, and spectators even notice.

 

Certainly the swim team would love an audience, and this is 100% a shameless plug to try to get you all interested in coming, but aside from the competition, I will definitely be continuing to pay attention to these thoughts and others in order to hopefully insert any improvements in the relationship between nature and the sport I love.

RP4 Hawks and Guns

Whilst exploring the various forms of the culture that surrounds nature, nearly all prevalent and discussed attitudes have been positive and relatable from my standpoint. We have talked about nature – land, sea, animals, man, skies – adoringly, admiringly, appreciatively, thankfully, respectfully, curiously, nurturingly, thoughtfully. We have lauded its beauty and lamented its ill health, and we have all shared personal anecdotes of our encounters with it as a wondrous entity worthy of our inquiry. I felt we were challenged to peer over the ideological fence into a territory most of us find foreign in our adventures on Saturday.

The day began in comfortable territory, a gravel parking lot and a welcoming trailhead. The drive up to Hawk Mountain Sanctuary had become more picturesque with each turn we took, and the trees were tall around us as we walked up to the visitor center. However, the marketability of the destination was rapidly evident by the hordes of young boy scouts, families, and teen couples milling about the ticketing desk and gift shop. As we were asked to consider, I took note of the items for sale and the audiences they seemed to target. Being a young white woman from a treehugging family, I felt as though I was probably precisely the target audience. The type of merchandise available mirrored stereotypical interests of women and families. There were earrings, greeting cards, baby onesies and stuffed animals of various woodland critters. There were also practical items like hats and books and weather gear, as well as fair trade coffee and snacks. The goods appealed to an environmentally conscious consumer with an affinity for displaying that status.

It was interesting to note that once we were on the trail and at the cliff’s edge, this merchandise was not seen. The only people I saw with “Hawk Mountain” anything stitched into their apparel were those who worked at the sanctuary. Otherwise we seemed to be surrounded by everyday people with personally unique apparel and a simple affection for large birds of prey. It was here where I felt the cultures surrounding Hawk Mountain divided. At the center and before the viewpoint, visitors were loud and excitable, actively consuming as much information and visual stimuli as possible. Upon the ledge, the atmosphere was calm , unreflective of the cutting winds that brought the beautiful birds nearer and nearer to us. There was an unspoken respect between viewers and a clearly defined language between the veteran birders, and the experience was calming and uniting despite the cold. It felt like a respectful and thoughtful interaction with a nature we all felt at one with, and the juxtaposition of the farmlands on the horizons indicated a  purposefulness in that connection.

Though Hawk Mountain certainly had a tourist-y appeal, it was forgivable compared to what we encountered next at Cabela’s. Upon entering the “World’s Foremost Outfitter” I felt bombarded with camouflage, dead animals, and guns. I had expected it to be large, I had expected it to be absurd, but I had not expected it to be so violent. Following our peaceful and honestly humbling experience with the birders and their beloved subjects on the Hawk Mountain viewpoint, it was especially jarring to be confronted with racks upon racks of weapons and hunting apparel. I now know that if there is an article of clothing to be worn in this world, it is for sale at Cabela’s in some shade of camo.

But that was to be expected, after all, it’s a hunting store in the middle of nowhere Pennsylvania, land of the deer. What was most striking was the obviously intentional representation of man and nature vs. man in nature. The tendency was certainly to combine the two in a man over nature kind of sense. It would be difficult to say Cabela’s or its shoppers care not at all for the nature they consume, but the image portrayed in the big-game taxidermy and hunting trophy photos mounted on every free swath of wall was that the most important way to interact with nature was to dominate it. There is an underlying vibe of Cabela’s insistence that its consumers have the power to manipulate the nature around them, and that it is their 2nd amendment-given right to do so. The busy gun registration/check-out lines and various incarnations of guns for all ages incorporated this inclusive notion that nature is ours to take.

I am curious whether I would have felt so deeply uncomfortable at Cabela’s had we not just arrived from Hawk Mountain. I am also curious if I would have felt more or less uncomfortable had we not ended our time at Hawk Mountain with the slightly distressing Golden Eagle presentation. My main comparative takeaway between the two destinations was a curiosity about what a frequenter of one place (or similar) would think of the other. Would a Cabela’s enthusiast feel strange at Hawk Mountain? If so, for what reasons? Would they feel compelled to lower the numbers of certain kinds of raptors if they were reported in higher numbers? Would they wish there were snacks available on the trail? Or a history of the largest or otherwise most impressive birds “taken” at the sanctuary before it’s conservation designation? Likewise, would other more Hawk Mountain-y people (like I imagine much of the class would associate as) feel similarly dismissive or uncomfortable about the representation of a nature so deeply manipulated it barely mimics any kind of recognizable reality? Would either of these kinds of people walk away with a broadened perspective on whether their interpretation of the cultures of nature is best or not? I know I will pay more attention to merchandise in “outdoor” and “travel” stores from now on as well as the “information centers” of places of nature worship. I think these things have a lot more to do with our understanding of something that should be so innately ingrained in our culture than they ought to but given that we are at this point in consumer relations to “the great outdoors” I think it is most appropriate to consider how much is the right amount to control nature in our actions-violent or otherwise- and how much is the right amount to allow it to control us- as we wait for birds to fly by.

 

 

Consuming the Have-Been and Will-Be Consumed

I was looking on the internet for photos of The Kittery Trading Post, near where I live, when I came across this article (http://www.oddthingsiveseen.com/2013/03/the-inside-out-museum-cabelas.html) comparing KTP (the affectionate moniker for the store used by us locals) with Cabela’s. The man who wrote it took a moderately condescending stance, making allusions to the “rednecks” who frequent stores like Cabela’s but I agreed with the main point of this piece which focused on the prevalence and display of taxidermized animals at each location. Ocker (the writer) cites the difference in scale of the animals represented at KTP and Cabela’s and also the variety.

At KTP, the animals are positioned (mostly) tastefully, and are accessories to the merchandise as opposed to mascots in the shape of centerpieces. They are moose, mountain lions, otters, beavers, pheasants, and other critters who lived and died in Maine or other nearby parts of New England/Canada. Despite being someone who loves animals and is easily made sad at the thought of their death, I have never felt uncomfortable with the way these animals are presented (except for the babies, there’s a baby black bear on the way to the camping section that’s always broken my heart). Having read the post that the Cabela’s post is a response to (http://www.oddthingsiveseen.com/2012/11/dead-animals-and-christmas-shopping.html) I took this man’s reaction to be similar- one of amusement and amazement and an understanding of the store’s intention. It is a spectacle, to be sure, and it’s grown monumentally from it’s original roots as a fur trading post in the 1800s, but it retains a sense of authenticity and appreciation for that which it displays and sells in the name of nature.

At Cabela’s, walking through the front door feels like an assault of some sort. The way the animals were posed and mounted just made me imagine them all stacked in a massive pile with a Cabela’s manager plotting where they would go in the absurdly enormous warehouse-style store. This again seemed to accord with this man’s thoughts upon his encounter with the outdoor-retail superstore. The big game animals feel out of place and museum-like, but not in a way that one is intended to appreciate them so much as one is supposed to browse them on their way through the gift shop while they entertain more important matters, like guns and meat processors. Amusingly, Ocker was confused about the living fish surrounded by dead animals, just as we were when we analyzed “The Mountain”.

 

I don’t think Ocker felt as disconcerted by the experience as we did, and I find it entirely likely that many classmates would be just as disturbed by KTP as they were by Cabela’s. Perhaps it is my proximity to and history with KTP that allows me to view it as a nature-respecting, outdoors-promoting establishment. Perhaps it is my ties to Maine and my understanding of the states’ residents’ appreciation for moose and woodland critters that allows me to justify their displays as tasteful. But I found it really interesting to stumble upon this man’s investigation of both stores and wonder what comparisons and differences others might draw between the two.

Chuck Testa

 

At some point in high school, one of my friends stumbled upon this video and popularized it within my grade. It’s 65 seconds of awkward amusement, and our adventure at Cabela’s this Saturday reminded me of it. A few of us discussed our thoughts on and impressions of taxidermy which ranged from feelings of being creeped out to feelings of being sad for the loss of life and glorification of death by human dominance. I think this video is funny, but what does it say about taxidermy? Is it presented as an art form or as an assertion of humans controlling that which they seek to kill?

Environmental Policy Twist

I don’t precisely recall how I stumbled upon this site but I imagine it was a video I found somewhere linked on Facebook. I have had this page open as a tab on my computer for about a week and I decided today to see what it was about. I was immediately dramatically surprised and dismayed to find that “www.environmentalpolicyalliance.org” is not an environmentally friendly website at all. It leads off with aggressive statements like, “If you think environmentalists are overzealous today when they (falsely) link fracking to serious health and environmental problems, take a look at their long track record of silly doomsday predictions,” and continues to correlate decreased fossil fuel use with increased environmental well-being.

I find it discouraging that this site clearly masquerades as a positive source of policy news and environmental awareness when it is clearly propaganda for the fossil fuel industry.

This is why we can’t have nice things. UGH.

http://environmentalpolicyalliance.org/the-environment-is-improving/

 

Gendered Nature

Today in class we talked about gendered nature in the context of Hemingway’s, “The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber” and how it applies to social perceptions of hunting and masculinity. Shortly following class I watched a quick episode of That 70’s Show, which is, for those unfamiliar, a show from the early 2000s about a group of friends in the 1970s. It specifically focuses on the Forman family, comprised of lead role Eric, his veteran father Red, and his nurse mother Kitty.

In this particular episode, the “men” of the show go deer hunting. Eric’s girlfriend, who is often depicted as more “masculine” or “tough” than Eric, wants to go, but is told to stay behind with the women. Naturally, the women are shown gossiping and playing with each others hair (and as the afternoon rolls on, playing cards and drinking wine). Also naturally, the men are engaged in a struggle for top dog in their adventure to the woods. Perhaps the central scene of the episode revolves around Eric and Red perched on a platform scouting for deer. When Red spots a buck, he “gives the kill” so to speak, to Eric. Eric misses, and Red spends a good amount of time chastising him for his inadequacy as a man, citing his own military success as an indicator of masculine dominance over his son. Eric is often criticized on the show for being delicate or weak, and in this case, it was by his father for not being manly enough to have the hunting skills to kill a deer.

A while after the missed shot, Eric points to a soda can far away and shoots it cleanly, much to Red’s surprise. Eric explains that he hadn’t missed the deer, he simply hadn’t wanted to kill it. He demonstrates his appreciation for nature as the reason for not killing a living being. This is interesting because in this instance, he needs to justify his manhood by citing  a personal connection to something that defies traditional masculinity.

Pups and Wonder in the Catskills

Though I am by no means a morning person, I was eager to rise for the trek out to the Catskills last week. My legs were less-than-thrilled to find out they would not fit in front of me, but a few creative sleeping arrangements later, I managed to squeak out a restful 12 or so minute nap on the way there. I have always had an unexplained and probably unnecessary disdain for New York (perhaps my New England sports allegiance extending too far) so I did not have any real expectations for the adventure beyond excitement to be outdoors. Upon arrival my creaky limbs were itching to get moving, and I took to the trail at a near-jog’s pace.

Once I remembered the squats I’d suffered through two days prior, I slowed it down and enjoyed the ascent with the lovely and chipper company of my classmates. Though my usual approach to hiking is kind of a race to the top and a loiterer’s appreciation of the view, I am very easily pleased by nearly every trail I’ve tackled. I was refreshed by the brisk woodsy air, and enamored with the confetti-like scattering of leaves on the ground.

Not long into the hike, we stumbled upon our first dog. I am a BIG dog person, many people liken me to a dog in fact, so naturally, I paused to enjoy the fuzzy hiker. She was a young 4 months old and so eager to take on the trail with her family. The cold air didn’t bother her in the slightest, and she was scaling the rocks like an old pro (despite it being her first hike). Soon after, we encountered a couple and their young daughter and their adult Collie mix. She led the charge, performing impressive switchback maneuvers up ahead before doubling back to be with her humans.

We passed a number of other dogs along the trail, and I was filled with childlike joy each time. They also led me to consider what dogs might think and feel when they accompany their human counterparts in such endeavors. I imagine they must have so excited and pure thoughts about the scents and sights around them. I think I began to aspire to experience the adventure in such a way. I generally don’t think much about my footing and direction while hiking, but I began to take each step even more lightly and precariously, trusting my instinct as a part of nature to guide me safely to the ledges.

Once there, I perched myself as close to the edge as my peers would allow and absorbed the stunning view and all that accompanied it. I was filled with the familiar sense of wonder and satisfaction that follows a successful foray into the forest. I wondered then and I wonder now how the pups might feel in such a moment. Are they aware of their proximity to danger? Are they pleased with their successful ascent? Do they just wish they could find a ball to chase? I hope one day with a dog of my own I can come to understand the pup-like wonder that must come with experiences in the wild.

Coywolfs Taking to the Streets

From my vast knowledge of biology (i.e.: Bio 102 last semester) I am aware that the crossing of genes does not often produce a viable being, or in this case, a debatable new species. I think this is an interesting article because it doesn’t really explore the magnitude of human implications on the built and natural environments within which we exist, but it opens the door for such a discussion. It makes me think also of how grizzly bears and polar bears are starting to interbreed due to the loss of arctic habitats. It is interesting to consider the impacts this will have on species and ecosystem interactions and I think it gives rise to questions about the significance of maintaining the separate-ness of wolves, coyotes, and domesticated dogs.

http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21677188-it-rare-new-animal-species-emerge-front-scientists-eyes?cid1=cust%2Fednew%2Fn%2Fbl%2Fn%2F20151029n%2Fowned%2Fn%2Fn%2Fnwl%2Fn%2Fn%2FNA%2Fn