Response Paper The Last

Cultures of Nature Final Response Paper (RP6, 4-5 pages)

Due: 5:00 PM Wednesday, December 16

51TXrpgZMjL._SX496_BO1,204,203,200_ Option 1: Your Personal Cultures of Nature Manifesto

Manifesto = a public declaration

of the views, aims, intentions, opinions of a person or group

Option 1 for the final response paper is an energetic vision, an articulation and final word on the issues raised in the course. Here you declare and assert your own ideas about nature, and how humans and nature are to coexist now and into the future. The paper should clearly integrate/bounce off/offer homage to some of the texts and ideas discussed in class as well as our out-of-class experiences, and could also incorporate relevant outside source material and perspectives. But the dominant voice and vision in this manifesto comes from YOU. This is your chance to synthesize some of what you have learned in the course, as well as a chance to tackle something you’ve not yet been able to address in a sustained way. The work may proceed from writing you have already done for the course (but be expanded and transformed) or it may be something entirely new. Use graphics, images, or quotes as appropriate, and citations and reference list.

g11165_u66089_flipper090720_2_250

Option 2: Story of a Place and You

Option 2 is your own personal written version of the Story of Place assignment. This is your chance to tell perhaps a more complete or somewhat different Story of Place, as well as to address something that didn’t make the final cut or that others in your group voted down for one reason or another. The paper may be about the same place as the video or a completely different place (about which you have done similar layers of research). This paper may also proceed from writing you have already done for the course blog (e.g., the research log reports). As in your video, your paper should tell an engaging story of change, including historical details and demonstrating knowledge and perspectives on both nature and culture, with connections to some of the texts and ideas discussed in class. What is different here is that you should account for change in YOU as connected to the place. Use graphics, images, or quotes as appropriate, and citations and reference list.

Koyaanisqatsi

Repeat After me… “KOYAANISQATSI”

koyaanisqatsi-landscape

Koyaanisqatsi (1983). Directed by Godfrey Reggio; music by Philip Glass, cinematography by Ron Fricke. The title, which also serves as theme and plot, comes from the Hopi language and translates roughly as “life out of balance,” “crazy life,” or “life disintegrating.” Void of dialog or characters (other than the human race as a whole), Koyaanisqatsi is pure image and music. Reggio provides vast and stunning scenes of the natural world, equally beautiful human creations of the city and industry, as well as the relentless pace (and cost) of modern life. Striking in its association of unlike objects and scenes, and propelled by Glass’ hypnotic score, Koyaanisqatsi asserts a specific claim and argues powerfully from a particular ideological position.

Where is this film effective in conveying its “emotional” message? How does the film manipulate (though chosen in camera, sound or editing) its audience? How, for instance, is nature portrayed? How is culture portrayed? What does the mise-en-scene suggest? How are individual people represented in Koyaanisqatsi? Where is the camera located? Where is the speed of the film varied and why? What would you say is the tone of the film and how is it established? Look for things like time, perspective, movement, repetition, and sound. How does the music function in the film? Does the music provide support or actually drive the narrative? How?

ky1

Koyaanisqatsi as a good example of “associational form,” and editing technique that juxtaposes seemingly unlike things to prove a point. If you believe this film lacks typical narrative organization and subsequently relies upon its audience noticing recurring elements, what are some of those elements? Where do motifs repeat? Where does the grouping of images and/or sound express concepts or even argumentative points?

What are the politics of this film? Is Koyaanisqatsi propaganda? If so, what kind and what makes it so?

ky3

In response to our viewing of Koyaanisqatsi, please offer a two part/paragraph blog post:

Part One: Provide your gut reaction. Say how the film made you feel. Were you moved? Irritated? Disgusted? Go ahead and vent if you want. Would you recommend this film? Why?

Part Two: Delineate the argument, thesis, or point of the film. Be as objective and as different from your personal tone in Part One as you can. How is the argument advanced? Detail some formal choices you noticed and analyze the manipulation of the viewer. How, exactly, is the argument made? Think of your task as explaining what goes on behind the magic curtain to those in the audience who see only the show and are unaware of the manipulation. What is nature, or the state of nature, according to Koyaanisqatsi, and how is this portrait achieved cinematically?

And maybe this: Can art help us save the world?

For reference, here are translations of the Hopi Prophecies sung in the film:

“If we dig precious things from the land, we will invite disaster.”
“Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.”
“A container of ashes might one day be thrown from the sky, which could burn the land and boil the oceans.”

Dwelling, by Linda Hogan

Linda Hogan

Dwellings

Not far from where I live is a hill that was cut into by the moving water of a creek. Eroded this way, all that’s left of it is a broken wall of earth that contains old roots and pebbles woven together and exposed. Seen from a distance, it is only a rise of raw earth. But up close it is something wonderful, a small cliff dwelling that looks almost as intricate and well made as those the Anasazi left behind when they vanished mysteriously centuries ago. This hill is a place that could be the starry skies at night turned inward into the thousand round holes where solitary bees have lived and died. It is a hill of tunneling rooms. At the mouths of some of the excavations, half-circles of clay beetle out like awnings shading a doorway. It is earth that was turned to clay in the mouths of the bees and spit out as they mined deeper into their dwelling places.

This place is where the bees reside at an angle safe from rain. It faces the southern sun. It is a warm and intelligent architecture of memory, learned by whatever memory lives in the blood. Many of the holes still contain gold husks of dead bees, their faces dry and gone, their flat eyes gazing out from death’s land toward the other uninhabited half of the hill that is across the creek from the catacombs.

The first time I found the residence of the bees, it was dusty summer. The sun was hot, and land was the dry color of rust. Now and then a car rumbled along the dirt road and dust rose up behind it before settling back down on older dust. In the silence, the bees made a soft droning hum. They were alive then, and working the hill, going out and returning with pollen , in and out through the holes, back and forth between daylight and the cooler, darker regions of the inner earth. They were flying an invisible map charted by landmarks, the slant of light, and a circling story they told one another about the direction of food held inside the center of yellow flowers.

Sitting in the hot sun, watching the small bees fly in and out around the hill, hearing the summer birds, the light breeze, I felt right in the world. I belonged there. I thought of my own dwelling places, those real and those imagined. Once I lived in a town called Manitou, which means “Great Spirit”, and where hot mineral springwater gurgled beneath the streets and rose into open wells. I felt safe there. With the underground movement of water and heat a constant reminder of other life, of what lives beneath us, it seemed to be the center of the world.

A few years after that, I wanted silence. My daydreams were full of places I longed to be, shelters and solitudes. I wanted a room apart from others, a hidden cabin to rest in. I wanted to be in a redwood forest with trees so tall the owls called out in the daytime. I daydreamed of living in a vapor cave a few hours away from here. Underground, warm, and moist, I thought it would be the perfect world or staying out of cold winter, for escaping the noise of living.

And how often I’ve wanted to escape to a wilderness where a human hand has not been in everything. But those were only dreams of peace, of comfort, of a nest inside stone or woods, a sanctuary where a dream or life wouldn’t be invaded.

Years ago, in the next canyon west of here, there was a man who followed one of those dreams and moved into a cave that could only be reached by climbing down a rope. For years the lived there in comfort, like a troglodyte. The inner weather was stable, never too hot, too cold, too wet, or too dry. But then he felt lonely. His utopia needed a woman. He went to town until he found a wife. For a while after the marriage, his wife climbed down the rope along with him, but before long she didn’t want the mice scurrying about in the cave, or the untidy bats that wanted to hang from the stones in the ceiling. So they built a door. Because of the closed entryway, the temperature changed. They had to put in heat. Then the inner moisture of earth warped the door, so they had to have air-conditioning, and after that the earth wanted to go about life in its own way and it didn’t give in to the people.

In other days and places, people paid more attention to the strong-headed will of earth. Once homes were built of wood that had been felled from a single region in a forest. That way, it was thought, the house would hold together more harmoniously, and the family of walls would not fall or lend themselves to the unhappiness or arguments of the inhabitants.

An Italian immigrant to Chicago, Aldo Piacenzi, built birdhouses that were dwellings of harmony and peace. They were the incredible spired shapes of cathedrals in Italy. They housed not only the birds, but also his memories, his own past. He painted them watery blue of his Mediterranean, the wild rose of flowers in a summer field. Inside them was straw and the droppings of lives that laid eggs, fledglings who grew there. What places to inhabit, the bright and sunny birdhouses in dreary alleyways of the city.

One beautiful afternoon, cool and moist, with the kind of yellow light that falls on earth in these regions, I waited for barn swallows to return from their daily work of food gathering. Inside the tunnel where they live, hundreds of swallows had mixed their saliva with mud and clay, much like the solitary bees, and formed nests that were as a potter’s bowl. At five in the evening, they returned all at once, a dark, flying shadow. Despite their enormous numbers and the crowding together of nests, they didn’t pause for even a moment before entering the nests, nor did they crowd one another. Instantly they vanished into the nests. The tunnel went silent. It held no outward signs of life.

But I knew they were there, filled with the fire of living. And what a marriage of elements was in those nests. Not only mud’s earth and water, the fire of sun and dry air, but even the elements contained one another. The bodies of prophets and crazy men were broken down in that soil.

I’ve noticed often how when a house is abandoned, it begins to sag. Without a tenant, it has no need to go on. If it were a person, we’d say it is depressed or lonely. The roof settles in, the paint cracks, the walls and floorboards warp and slope downward in their own natural ways, telling us that life must stay in everything as the world whirls and tilts and moves through boundless space.

One summer day, cleaning up after long-eared owls where I work at a rehabilitation facility for birds of prey, I was raking the gravel floor of a flight cage. Down on the ground, something looked like it was moving. I bent over to look into the pile of bones and pellets I’d just raked together. There, close to the ground, were to fetal mice. They were new to the planet, pink and hairless. They were so tenderly young. Their faces had swollen blue-veined eyes. They were nestles in a mound of feathers, soft as velvet, each one curled up smaller than an infant’s ear, listening to the first sounds of earth. But the ants were biting them. They turned in agony, unable to pull away, not yet having the arms or legs to move, but feeling, twisting away from, the pain of the bites. I was horrified to see them bitten out of life that way. I dipped them in water, as if to take away the sting, and let the ants fall in the bucket. Then I held the tiny mice in the palm of my hand. Some of the ants were drowning in the water. I was trading one life for another, exchanging the lives of the ants for those of mice, but I hated their suffering, and hated even more that they had not yet grown to a life, and already they inhabited the miserable world of pain. Death and life feed each other. I know that.

Inside these rooms where birds are healed, there are other lives besides those of mice. There are fine gray globes the wasps have woven together, the white cocoons of spiders in a corner, the downward tunneling anthills. All these dwellings are inside one small waster space, but I think most about the mice. Sometimes the downy nests fall out of the way of their enemies. When one of the nests falls, they are so well made and soft, woven mostly from the chest feathers of birds. Sometimes the leg of a small quail holds the nest together like a slender cornerstone with dry, bent claws. The mice have adapted to life in the presence of their enemies, adapted to living in the thing wall between beak and beak, claw and claw. They move their nests often, as if a new rafter or wall will protect them from the inevitable fate of all our returns home to the deeper, wider nests of earth that houses us all.

One August at Zia Pueblo during the old corn dance I noticed tourists picking up shards of all the old pottery that had been made and broken there. The residents of Zia know not to take the bowls and pots left behind by the older ones. They know that the fragments of those earlier lives need to be smoothed back to earth, but younger nations, travelers from continents across the world who have come to inhabit this land, have little of their own to grow on. The pieces of earth that were formed into bowls, even on their way home to dust, provide the new people a lifetime to an unknown land, help them remember that they live in the old nest of earth.

It was in early February, during the mating season of the great horned owl. It was dusk, and I hiked up the back of a mountain to where I’d heard the owls a year before. I wanted to hear them again, the voices so tender, so deep, like a memory of comfort. I was halfway up the trail when I found a soft, round nest. It had fallen from one of the bare-branched trees. It was a delicate nest, woven together of feathers, sage, and strands of wild grass. Holding it in my hand in the rosy twilight, I noticed that a blue thread was entwined with the other gatherings there. I pulled at the thread a little, and then I recognized it. It was a thread from on of my skirts. It was blue cotton. It was the unmistakable color and shape of a pattern I knew. I liked it, that a thread of my life was in an abandoned nest, one that had held eggs and new life. I took the nest home. At home, I held it to the light and looked more closely. There, to my surprise, nestled into the gray-green sage, was a gnarl of black hair. It was also unmistakable. It was my daughter’s hair, cleaned from a brush and picked up out in the sun beneath the maple tree, or the pit cherry where the birds eat the overladen, fertile branches until only the seeds remain on the trees.

I didn’t know what kind of nest it was, or who has lived there. It didn’t matter. I thought of the remnants of our lives carried up the hill that way and turned into shelter. That night, resting inside the walls of our home, the world outside weighed so heavily against the thin wood of the house. The sloped roof was the only thing between us and the universe. Everything outside of our wooden boundaries seemed so large. Filled with the night’s citizens, it all came alive. The world opened in the thickets of the dark. The wild grapes would soon ripen on the vines. The burrowing ones were emerging. Horned owls sat in the treetops. Mice scurried here and there. Skunk, fox, the slow and holy porcupine, all were passing by this way. The young of the solitary bees were feeding on the pollen in the dark. The whole world was a nest on its humble tilt, in the maze of the universe, holding us.

Linda Hogan, a member of the Chickasaw tribe, was born in 1947 in Denver, Colorado. She is an activist in Native American and environmental causes, a poet, playwright, fiction writer, and essayist, and has taught American Indian Studies and English. An important figure in Native American literature, Hogan in her writing makes a strong case for the value of her culture and the contribution that its way of knowing can make to the way we think about our relationship to the natural world. “Dwellings” is from Hogan’s Dwellings: A Spiritual History of the Living World (1995).

Bear and Geese, by N. Scott Momaday

To an Aged Bear

Hold hard this infirmity.

It defines you. You are old.

Now fix yourself in summer,
In thickets of ripe berries,

And venture toward the ridge
Where you were born. Await there

The setting sun. Be alive
To that old conflagration

One more time. Mortality
Is your shadow and your shade.

Translate yourself to spirit;
Be present on your journey.

Keep to the trees and waters.
Be the singing of the soil.

 

Angle of Geese

How shall we adorn
Recognition with our speech?—
Now the dead firstborn
Will lag in the wake of words.

Custom intervenes;
We are civil, something more:
More than language means,
The mute presence mulls and marks.

Almost of a mind,
We take measure of the loss;
I am slow to find
The mere margin of repose.

And one November
It was longer in the watch,
As if forever,
Of the huge ancestral goose.

So much symmetry!—
Like the pale angle of time
And eternity.
The great shape labored and fell.

Quit of hope and hurt,
It held a motionless gaze
Wide of time, alert,
On the dark distant flurry.

Columbus Day, by Jimmie Durham

Columbus Day
by Jimmie Durham

In school I was taught the names
Columbus, Cortez, and Pizarro and
A dozen other filthy murderers.
A bloodline all the way to General Miles,
Daniel Boone and General Eisenhower.

No one mentioned the names
Of even a few of the victims.
But don’t you remember Chaske, whose spine
Was crushed so quickly by Mr. Pizarro’s boot?
What words did he cry into the dust?
What was the familiar name
Of that young girl who danced so gracefully
That everyone in the village sang with her–
Before Cortez’ sword hacked off her arms
As she protested the burning of her sweetheart?
That young man’s name was Many Deeds,
And he had been a leader of a band of fighters
Called the Redstick Hummingbirds, who slowed
The march of Cortez’ army with only a few
Spears and stones which now lay still
In the mountains and remember.
Greenrock Woman was the name
Of that old lady who walked right up
And spat in Columbus’ face. We
Must remember that, and remember
Laughing Otter the Taino who tried to stop
Columbus and was taken away as a slave.
We never saw him again.
In school I learned of heroic discoveries
Made by liars and crooks. The courage
Of millions of sweet and true people
Was not commemorated.
Let us then declare a holiday
For ourselves, and make a parade that begins
With Columbus’ victims and continues
Even to our grandchildren who will be named
In their honor.
Because isn’t it true that even the summer
Grass here in this land whispers those names,
And every creek has accepted the responsibility
Of singing those names? And nothing can stop
The wind from howling those names around
The corners of the school.
Why else would the birds sing
So much sweeter here than in other lands?
–Copyright 1993 by Jimmie Durham. Published in “Columbus Day,” West End Press, 1993. Used by permission. (West End Press, P.O. Box 27334, Albuquerque, NM 87125)

Ecological Literary Criticism, a beginning

978-0-674-25861-7-thumb
Ecological Literary Criticism

To begin considering how we, as writers, might come to a greater awareness of the environmental underpinnings and ecological considerations of the texts we create, we can begin with Lawrence Buell’s succinct phrase, “the environmental imagination.” In his ground-breaking work, The Environmental Imagination, Buell outlines what he believes to be the four earmarks of an environmental text:

1) The nonhuman environment is present not merely as a framing device but as a presence that begins to suggest that human history is implicated in natural history;

2) The human interest is not understood to be the only legitimate interest;

3) Human accountability to the environment is part of the text’s ethical orientation; and

4) Some sense of the environment as a process rather than as a constant or a given is at least implicit in the text.

Catch-Up Monday

IMG_4203

All,

We will not meet class formerly today and instead, after a busy last week, call today our Catch-Up Monday.

Please use today to advance your work on your Story of Place assignment. Alternately, please catch up on blogging and reading. See you Wednesday for some “Nature Wars.”

Peace,

A&D