Wednesday, when the Simpson’s clip was being showed, I was reminded of a clip from an episode of That 70’s Show. In the episode a group of guys go hunting. Towards the end of the episode Eric ends up in a blind alone with his father, Red, and is given the opportunity to shoot a “ten point” buck. Eric balks at the opportunity and misses the shot, and for the remainder of the time in the blind Red is giving Eric a hard time.

This clip is pretty long, and bad quality but it is all I could find of the episode. If you skip to 14:25 and watch until approximately 15:00 you’ll see Red’s reaction to finding out that Eric missed the shot on purpose. The reason I thought of this clip was because, and attached it even though the quality is kind of shitty, is because I thought it was an interesting balance to the clip from the Simpson’s. Although there is an underlying message that relates being able to fire a gun to masculinity, it shows Red respecting his sons desire to not want to kill the buck. For those unfamiliar with the show, Red’s character is considered more of a manly man. This fact, coupled with him accepting his son’s lack of desire to hunt, shows a different idea on hunting than Homer Simpson. Red is more concerned with his son being a good shot than hunting making him a man.

This is a film that I first saw in Andy’s Environment and Film class last year. It left a very lasting impression on me, especially as an EVST student. This film has no dialogue but it doesn’t need it. The way the information is conveyed is very different, using time-lapse and slow motion, but the message is even stronger. The beginning of the film is just of nature (i.e the ocean, wildlife, etc), then it shows images of human’s impact on the land. Towards the end we see city life and people in the city. The last scene brought me to tears, and I hope you get the chance to see the entire film at some point because it can be an enlightening, angering, and enjoyable film all at the same time.

Our discussion of the night sky in class today made me think of a photography exhibit from Thierry Cohen that a friend showed me last year. It is a photo series that imagines cities from around the world without any streetlights, under the night sky. The artist visited nine cities and took photos of them during the day. He then visited spots on the same longitude that had little to no light pollution and took photos of the night sky. For instance, the skies above Shanghai are actually in Western Sahara and Paris is illuminated by the stars over Montana at locations on the same longitude. Here are a few of the striking images, let me know what you think!

SERIE VILLES ETEINTES

Anthropocentric spread of invasive pathogens in wildlife and domestic animal populations, so-called pathogen pollution, poses substantial threats to biodiversity and ecosystem integrity and is of major concern in conservation efforts (Winifred F. Frick et al. 679). 

This statement from the introduction of the bat article truly resonates with me because I recently researched amphibians of the tropical Andes, which has the most amphibians in the world of any biodiversity hotspot and the main cause of there extinction is human introduced pathogens and viruses. Additionally, they are also being effected by anthropocentric climate change another human induced problem that may extinct 70-80% of all amphibian species within the next 50 years. The real questions now is can they be conserved because human interference in these hotspot areas is only increasing and climate change seems to have only begun rearing its true face.

Last class we discussed the sandhill crane because of its long history, so during the Dillard reading I was happy to see a section on monarch butterflies. Their history is noted in this quote from Pilgrim at Tinker Creek: “Each successive swarm repeats this mysterious dogleg movement, year after year. Entomologists actually think that the butterflies might be “remembering” the position of a long-gone, looming glacier.” (258)

I am convinced that butterflies, let alone most species, can see and feel a history that we cannot. The monarchs and cranes could easily achieve a Story of Place assignment.

The pond metaphors-too great to note all (seasons, man, gun firer), but here is a passage that I enjoyed from Spring in Walden: “The pond began to boom about an hour after sunrise, when it felt the influence of the sun’s rays slanted upon it from over the hills; it stretched itself and yawned like a waking man with a gradually increasing tumult, which was kept up three or four hours.” (326)

A man said to the universe:
“Sir I exist!”
“However,” replied the universe,
“The fact has not created in me
A sense of obligation.”

–Stephen Crane, 1899

Interview with Paul Bogard, author of The End of Night: Searching for Natural Darkness in an Age of Artificial Light:

http://v-e-n-u-e.com/In-Search-of-Darkness-An-Interview-with-Paul-Bogard

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/06/science/exxon-mobil-under-investigation-in-new-york-over-climate-statements.html

News out of New York: State Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman has issued a subpoena to Exxon Mobil in regards to an investigation as to whether or not the energy giant lied to both investors and the public at large regarding climate change.

This signals a massive shift in public policy towards the energy giants, as in the recent past, favorable outcomes for fossil fuel oriented businesses have been rendered in lawsuits, criminal proceedings, and even with politicians at large. Just recently, in my home state of New Jersey, Governor Christie has used a settlement met with Exxon (roughly around 225$ million dollars) as a boasting point on the campaign trail; but, as many scientific and environmental scholars can attest to, this was actually a concession to Exxon, and not nearly the win that it has made it out to be by the Christie camp.

These small steps, a subpoena and court proceedings, are the first steps towards changing the public perception of climate change. It is no advertised fact that many of the companies who rely heavily on fossil fuels saw their research and development numbers equate to 90% of funding towards fossil fuels, and 10% towards investment in new renewable energy methods. A step in the right direction for the government indeed.