Gendered Nature

Today in class we talked about gendered nature in the context of Hemingway’s, “The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber” and how it applies to social perceptions of hunting and masculinity. Shortly following class I watched a quick episode of That 70’s Show, which is, for those unfamiliar, a show from the early 2000s about a group of friends in the 1970s. It specifically focuses on the Forman family, comprised of lead role Eric, his veteran father Red, and his nurse mother Kitty.

In this particular episode, the “men” of the show go deer hunting. Eric’s girlfriend, who is often depicted as more “masculine” or “tough” than Eric, wants to go, but is told to stay behind with the women. Naturally, the women are shown gossiping and playing with each others hair (and as the afternoon rolls on, playing cards and drinking wine). Also naturally, the men are engaged in a struggle for top dog in their adventure to the woods. Perhaps the central scene of the episode revolves around Eric and Red perched on a platform scouting for deer. When Red spots a buck, he “gives the kill” so to speak, to Eric. Eric misses, and Red spends a good amount of time chastising him for his inadequacy as a man, citing his own military success as an indicator of masculine dominance over his son. Eric is often criticized on the show for being delicate or weak, and in this case, it was by his father for not being manly enough to have the hunting skills to kill a deer.

A while after the missed shot, Eric points to a soda can far away and shoots it cleanly, much to Red’s surprise. Eric explains that he hadn’t missed the deer, he simply hadn’t wanted to kill it. He demonstrates his appreciation for nature as the reason for not killing a living being. This is interesting because in this instance, he needs to justify his manhood by citing  a personal connection to something that defies traditional masculinity.

Brutus The Grizzly Bear

I saw this video for the first time approximately three years ago. When I had first watched it I thought how awesome it would be to have a pet grizzly bear. I honestly still think it’d be one hell of an experience to ride on the back of a grizzly bear as the man in the video does, but now my thoughts on the video are different. Watching the clips from The Grizzly Man, especially the man talking about how Timothy Treadwell was wrong for his interactions with the bears, caused me to wonder if the interaction with this domesticated bear is something to be envious of, or to be happy about.

I was curious what you all thought about it.

On Hunting

“‘You’re both talking rot,’ said Margot. ‘Just because you’ve chased some helpless animals in a motor car you talk like heroes'” (Hemingway 2025).

This passage reminded me of the discussion we had in class last week about hunting, especially the point that Owen made about his own family and how the people who continue to hunt are in it for the whole experience and not just for the killing part. This point neatly overlapped into the biology course I am currently taking. Last week we talked about commercial whale hunting and the moratorium that is currently in place. One of the exceptions to the moratorium is for indigenous people, such as the Inuits. They are allowed to continue hunting whales because they have low impact on the populations, but also because whales are a integral part of their culture. When they catch a whale, they use all of the whale and share it with their village, unlike commercial whaling which leaves a lot to waste.

Coywolfs Taking to the Streets

From my vast knowledge of biology (i.e.: Bio 102 last semester) I am aware that the crossing of genes does not often produce a viable being, or in this case, a debatable new species. I think this is an interesting article because it doesn’t really explore the magnitude of human implications on the built and natural environments within which we exist, but it opens the door for such a discussion. It makes me think also of how grizzly bears and polar bears are starting to interbreed due to the loss of arctic habitats. It is interesting to consider the impacts this will have on species and ecosystem interactions and I think it gives rise to questions about the significance of maintaining the separate-ness of wolves, coyotes, and domesticated dogs.

http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21677188-it-rare-new-animal-species-emerge-front-scientists-eyes?cid1=cust%2Fednew%2Fn%2Fbl%2Fn%2F20151029n%2Fowned%2Fn%2Fn%2Fnwl%2Fn%2Fn%2FNA%2Fn

 

Teddies

In a strange coincidence, we start into the Sterba book, and both your instructors see Ursus americanus!!! Prof Smith and family had one visit their home Wednesday evening, and watched it take a dip in the creek. Yesterday I saw two young bears working their way through the forest near Merrill Creek Reservoir (across the river in NJ). See pics below

JS1A5916-3600

closeup view

closeup view

Last summer one briefly appeared on campus. You may have heard about the attack last fall in northern NJ – see story here