Month: April 2014 (Page 2 of 3)

Obama Extends Review of Pipeline Project

The Keystone Pipeline Project is basically a plan to build a pipe from Canada’s Alberta tar sands to PA in the U.S in order to transport crude oil more efficiently.

President Obama has extended his review of the Keystone Pipeline Project indefinitely. The reason for this hold up is due to a Nebraska judge ruling one of the state’s laws, allowing the pipeline to be built, unconstitutional. As the pipeline must pass through Nebraska, this will pose a major challenge.

The companies in Canada which are working on the pipeline are not happy with this and many other political hold ups in the U.S.

What do you think of the pipeline project? Is it sustainable since it would increase efficiency and produce jobs, or is it not since it would increase the use of fossil fuels?

Link here

Nuclear Plant Location Alternative

It wasn’t the earthquake or flood that caused the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant to explode and release toxins, it was the subsequent failure of the cooling systems due to the power shutdown.

A new location for the plants has been proposed, and NIMBY  isn’t a problem. They are in the process of designing a nuclear floating platform to put in the ocean miles from the coast and at 100 meter depths. This would diminish all tsunami and earthquake concerns if the platform is far enough away from land. “The biggest selling point is the enhanced safety.” The ocean plants would use the surrounding water in case of an emergency cooling shutdown.

The article only lists advantages to the offshore nuclear plants, but I’m sure there is an equal amount of disadvantages such as transferring the energy to land…what else would dissuade people from investing in this alternative?

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/04/140416112956.htm

Opinion: Why I think all 50 states should be bottle deposit states

At this moment, only ~11 states are bottle deposit states. In another words, you would be charged 5 cents extra per plastic and glass bottles and aluminum cans (10 cents for Michigan). And once you take them to the recycling machines to return these bottles/cans, you’d get a refund of that five cents (ten for Michigan). I personally think that all 50 states should be bottle deposit states and 5 cents is not enough. Maybe ten or even twenty might be reasonable. When people are being charged more, they will be more motivated to have a more sustainable mind, even if they choose to buy bottles.

To be more specific, a higher unit price may reduce the number of people who purchase the products. In addition, people who choose to purchase the products would at least save up the used bottles so that they can bring them to the recycling machines, which would not only pay them back but also that it motivates them to recycle significantly more. To make things even better, this would reduce the amount of littering from cars, bodies of waters and in public and private properties. Less littering would mean more beautiful landscape and protecting children and animals from the ultimate consequences like glass lacerations and the Great Pacific Trash Island (whereas birds and fish mistake plastic for food).

Dolphins as Persons

I attended Thomas White’s presentation on dolphins. He is a strong advocate for the protection of dolphins and their rights as intelligent individuals. He started by asking why humans have “human rights.” This was answered with a description of defining human characteristics, some of which include self-awareness, self-control, emotions, individual personalities, and respect for one another. It was then shown that dolphins are also believed to have many similar characteristics, based on studies done over the past few decades. If it is unethical to treat humans in a poor manner due to these characteristics, then it makes sense that dolphins should also be treated with respect; not kept in captivity or hunted.

Thomas White mentioned his website which, you can see in this link.

New info on fracking in PA shows it might be much worse for the environment

http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/page/national/unexpected-loose-gas-from-fracking/950/

A survey of hydraulic fracturing sites in Pennsylvania revealed drilling operations releasing plumes of methane 100 to 1,000 times the rate the EPA expects from that stage of drilling, according to a study published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Natural gas as an energy source for electric-ity production is less of a contributor to global warming than coal only if less than 3.2 percent of methane escapes during production. Recent measurements estimate that between 2.3 percent and 17.3 percent of gas escapes.

A sustainable way to conserve birds

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/15/science/paying-farmers-to-welcome-birds.html?ref=science&_r=0

In California, a area that was once wetlands is now 95% farm land and the result was a dramatic decrease in migratory birds. Conservationists have found an innovative way to preserve these birds. By using a smartphone app to record bird locations, scientist have determined the key areas to be preserved for the birds. Now instead of buying the habitat from the farmers, conservation organizations just pay to irrigate certain areas for a few weeks at a time.

Duke Energy’s $1 billion cleanup: Who would pay?

As public pressure builds to dig up coal ash from waste lagoons in North Carolina, Duke Energy is facing a potentially massive cleanup bill that the Charlotte electric utility has been trying to dodge.

Early indications suggest Duke’s price tag could approach $1 billion, based on ash removal expenses in South Carolina. Deciding who pays the bill – Duke’s customers or its shareholders – would pose another challenge.

http://www.newsobserver.com/2014/03/08/3682139/duke-energys-1-billion-cleanup.html

Massive Sea of Warmth Propels March to Fourth Hottest

An area of extraordinarily high temperature stretching more than half way around the globe helped propel this past March into the record books as the fourth warmest since historical record-keeping began in 1880, according to NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies.

The global average temperature for March was warmer only in 2002, 2010 and 1990.

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/imageo/2014/04/14/massive-sea-of-warmth/#.U01TJfldXZJ

Life Off The Energy Grid Is About To Become Mainstream Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/life-off-the-energy-grid-is-about-to-become-mainstream-2014-4#ixzz2yccHUjXm

This article is about the future of off-the-grid living, and how we may be at a turning point due to the availability of cheap batteries from Tesla Motor’s new factories. I think these batteries would make sustainable energy sources much more viable, such as when used with solar panels (see my last post).

Link Here

How solar energy could be the key to reducing economic inequality

This article espouses the benefits of solar power once it becomes competitive with and eventually cheaper than fossil fuel power. The main point is that this will help lower wealth inequality since everyone will have access to their own cheap power. However, I don’t believe this makes complete sense because many places in the world do not have enough sunny days for solar power to completely replace fossil fuels. This does not mean that solar power won’t have a large part in the future of energy, but just that energy storage needs to improve at the same rate that solar panel costs go down.

Link Here

History of oil drilling to help drought in Texas

At the University of Texas at Austin, the manager of the oil and gas drilling logs collection has looked into and researched the option of “drilling” for water to solve the current drought in Texas. Researchers are using records to map brackish groundwater to eventually go to a desalination plant. It was determined that an aquifer in West Texas holds 4.9 trillion gallons of fresh water and 27.7 trillion gallons of brackish water. However, this all depends on the support from legislature to make it happen.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/11/us/digging-up-old-drilling-logs-to-strike-not-oil-but-water.html?ref=science&_r=0

Computer modeling and nature

This article discusses how at the University of Illinois researchers are developing a computer model to help plant scientists breed better crops. They use soybean as an example and predict a 8.5% jump in productivity with a 13% drop in water loss and a 34% increases in radiation deflection. Technology advances like these will continue to advance the sustainability of agriculture and much more.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/04/140403132355.htm

Should the U.S. Care?

The article below discusses how for all of the power and wealth that the United States has we are ranked 16th in the Social Progress Index. Our impressive military and economic strengths do not translate well for our health, ecosystem sustainability, basic education, personal safety and much more.

http://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/04/04/should-the-united-states-care-that-its-not-no-1/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=1&

 

Phyto Remediation: Poplars and Pollution

Poplar trees, especially genetically modified poplars, have been in the news for their ability to decontaminate the ground of chemicals, specifically oil. In the link, the specific contaminant is TCE…an industrial solvent. The poplar trees absorb the water with the chemical over a period of about three years, the tree is cut down, and then put into a landfill.

This process seems unsustainable at first, but removing the contaminated ground takes more work and money. Also, poplar trees are fast-growing and short-living, so they’re the perfect candidate for the task.

What are some ways to test the efficacy of the poplar trees? How is it impacting landfills? Can we do anything else with the “used-up” trees?nature159

Bible verses relating to sustainability and the Earth

Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them. God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earthand subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground.” Genesis 1:26-28

The earth is the Lord’s, and everything in it, the world, and all who live in it; Psalm 24:1

Sustainable Camping

Last weekend I was looking into some hiking gear when I came across the Biolite CampStove. This little gadget is a pretty revolutionary outdoor cooking accessory. Not only does the Biolite contain a wood-burning cooking fire, but also features a small fan, which accelerates the energy release from the fuel.  Reliance on wood is a key feature that promotes sustainability. Most long distance hikers on tend to use portable, gas stoves to do their cooking because they are reliable. However with availability of a stove that efficiently turns firewood into energy, consumer tastes will compensate a little.

In a addition to relying on a more sustainable source of energy than traditional gas stoves, the Biolite CampStove has the ability to transfer heat into electric power. It uses a Thermoelectric Generator to power its external fan, as well as provide 2W of power output at 5V through a USB port. Although this technology is preferable to gas heat which tends to have a greater environmental impact, it still has more of an environmental impact than portable sources of solar electricity.

What do you think?  In a hypothetical situation where you had to hike a great distance like the Appalachian trial, would you consider carrying this item? How could the Biolite corporation implement this thermoelectric technology to benefit people in developing nations?

http://www.biolitestove.com

The Social Impact of Fracking

While reading more about the fracking in our state’s Macellus Shale I came across two articles that highlight fracking’s penchant for creating societal friction.

Here is a an excerpt from a Lancaster Online article, where a panel of Pennsylvania Quakers shared their perspective of fracking and its toll on their community.

“First they frack the community, then then they frack the land,” she said, at one point tearfully. “If you’re familiar with the tragedy of the commons, that is what happened to us. We could not hold together as a community.

“They set neighbor against neighbor. Families break up, family farms break up, fights happen. The greed and outrage machines begin on both sides. Bullying arrives.”

Another article from thinkprogress.org is reporting that the, “oil and gas company, Hilcorp,  is trying to use a 1961 Pennsylvania law that would allow the company to bundle properties of people who don’t sign drilling leases with their neighbors who do, meaning that even landowners who don’t sign leases will be forced to allow drilling under their land if enough of their neighbors sign leases.”

« Older posts Newer posts »