11 thoughts on “Nanoparticles in Biomolecular Imaging

  1. This podcast was very informative. It had great sound quality and flowed very well. Given hard material, I thought this group made is easier to comprehend. The music was inserted at appropriate times. If i had to suggest one thing, it would be to sound more enthusiastic at points. Overall, this was a very well done podcast, and should only be altered slightly.

  2. This podcast gave me a good understanding of how nano-particles are used in bio molecular imaging. Your segment on MRI and MNP was a good example of this, and the segment on iron oxide particles was especially informative. Also, the explanation of certain terminology, such as contrast agents and in vivo, helped the listener. I would suggest that you add some background music to make it easier to listen to.

  3. Great podcast! It was very informative without being boring. I really liked how you gave examples for the current research that is being done now. I also think you did a great job making a confusing topic simple enough for us to understand. I would make sure that you highlight the most important points using your other time for the presentation. Overall I think you did a great job.

  4. Nice. The podcast was really straight-forward and the Q&A’s were really helpful for making the information easier to absorb. I really didn’t expect myself to learn even a little bit how an MRI worked or the difference between MRI and MNP technologies. Also this podcast did a great job at showing the importance of nanotechnology in the imaging and the point of how nanoparticles properties change with respect to size just like it is pointed out in the Cancer Therapy podcast. Also liked the beginning when there was questions asked to others about what they thought nanoparticles were. good thoughts

  5. I thought this was a good overall podcast. I liked the way it was set up and how it was easy to follow/understand. It was also neat to hear about the research going on regarding nanoparticles in biomolecular imaging.

  6. This podcast is very creative. I really like how it is set up like a talk show. Also, it is very informative and easy to understand. The speakers are enthusiastic which makes the podcast more enjoyable.

  7. So the setup of your podcast was really creative and interesting and you handled the explanation of the topic very well considering it was very technical. I heard you discuss your schematic and i really liked being able to match up what I heard to what I saw on the screen. Great Work!

  8. Very interesting podcast. You guys took a good approach to explain a very complex topics. The enthusiasm of the interviewer was humorous to some degree but it kept the podcast fluent and attractive. I learned a lot actually, and the topic is very relevant to my research topic, so it was quite interesting to listen to this podcast.

  9. This podcast is very informational and enthusiastic. The music is a good addition to the creativity and flow of the podcast as well. The information presented in the podcast was very complex but it was broken down and made easy to understand. Very good job on this podcast.

  10. I’ll just start with ‘awesome..!’ I liked how you kept repeating that during the interview, it showed a lot of enthusiasm. Going back to the topic, I think it has really been well put and comprehend-able to someone who has not heard about it at all. Really informative and the examples were a plus. Good work!

  11. This podcast was very easy to listen to. First of all, the sound quality was very good which made it easier to stay focused on what was being said. Also, the question and answer format of this podcast was very helpful in my understanding of how nano particles help in biomedical engineering, often asking and answering the questions that I was asking myself while listening.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *