I thought the overall podcast was a success and was very factual, I enjoyed listening to it; however, there are a few areas I would recommend revisiting. First, the point I feel is the most important, is the overall speed of the podcast. I like that the material is not rushed and all of the material fit in the allotted time; however, at times the slower pace seemed to make the podcast a little monotonous. Aside from the speed, I picked up on a small editing error at about 4:05 in which it seems like the audio just needs to be trimmed (you can hear talk before the actual recording begins). Other than these two points I have no further suggestions.
The opening sets a good scene by laying out exactly what you are going to talk about. I also like how you present the good side and the bad side to give the listeners a full view about the field of microsurgery. All the details are very well explained and presented in a simple to follow format. Some of the sound after four minutes has a few problems. One of sound clips had background noise and could be rerecorded. Also it might flow better if there were breaks between the different experts, so the audience could understand it better. It is also interesting how you left the music on in the background the whole time, but I think it is a little distracting to do the whole time.
The layout of the podcast is excellent; the introductions for each member are clear, the use for each person’s research is very well-laid-out, and the details of the information and processes used for each topic are explicitly stated in a very procedural way. The music in the background is also very well-done, at a perfect volume to not be disruptive, yet still add a pleasant feel to the podcast.
I thought this was a very interesting and informative podcast concerning microsurgery. I like how you guys went though a process of describing how the progression of the surgery would play out. I found it very intriguing how you said that more types of procedures are available using this method. One thing that could have been improved was the sound. I would probably not have the music playing throughout the entire podcast and there was also a disturbance at 4:08 that should have been addressed.
The information in the podcast was very well put together and was easily understandable. There was a lot of information, but it was put together in a way so that it was not too much to digest at once. I liked that there was the pos and cons, as well as a little bit of history at the end. There was a little background noise at the end, and thought that the music playing the whole time was an interesting addition, but did not find it too distracting.
I thought the overall podcast was a success and was very factual, I enjoyed listening to it; however, there are a few areas I would recommend revisiting. First, the point I feel is the most important, is the overall speed of the podcast. I like that the material is not rushed and all of the material fit in the allotted time; however, at times the slower pace seemed to make the podcast a little monotonous. Aside from the speed, I picked up on a small editing error at about 4:05 in which it seems like the audio just needs to be trimmed (you can hear talk before the actual recording begins). Other than these two points I have no further suggestions.
The opening sets a good scene by laying out exactly what you are going to talk about. I also like how you present the good side and the bad side to give the listeners a full view about the field of microsurgery. All the details are very well explained and presented in a simple to follow format. Some of the sound after four minutes has a few problems. One of sound clips had background noise and could be rerecorded. Also it might flow better if there were breaks between the different experts, so the audience could understand it better. It is also interesting how you left the music on in the background the whole time, but I think it is a little distracting to do the whole time.
The layout of the podcast is excellent; the introductions for each member are clear, the use for each person’s research is very well-laid-out, and the details of the information and processes used for each topic are explicitly stated in a very procedural way. The music in the background is also very well-done, at a perfect volume to not be disruptive, yet still add a pleasant feel to the podcast.
I thought this was a very interesting and informative podcast concerning microsurgery. I like how you guys went though a process of describing how the progression of the surgery would play out. I found it very intriguing how you said that more types of procedures are available using this method. One thing that could have been improved was the sound. I would probably not have the music playing throughout the entire podcast and there was also a disturbance at 4:08 that should have been addressed.
The information in the podcast was very well put together and was easily understandable. There was a lot of information, but it was put together in a way so that it was not too much to digest at once. I liked that there was the pos and cons, as well as a little bit of history at the end. There was a little background noise at the end, and thought that the music playing the whole time was an interesting addition, but did not find it too distracting.