Ethics Report

In lieu of an ethics analysis and report, Greg, Lauren, Charles, and Mike R prepared an ethics debate for Professor Nadovich, Professor Wey, and the rest of the team on January 27, 2012. The main points on the “con” side were the loss of  jobs, the expense of the equipment, the potential environmental hazard, wireless interference, safety surrounding wireless hacking, and issues with having an autonomous boat.  The main points on the “pro” side were the efficiency, the safer working environment for the hydrologists, the minimal water presence, the versatility, the longer range, and the gain of a different job. Enjoy.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ethics Debate

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *