Should Transportation Systems Be Public Or Private?

In light of the recent sequester in Washington, I thought it might be interesting to think a little about the relationship between transportation systems and public policy. To what extent should the government manage and fund the design, operation, and maintenance of transportation systems? In one sense, it is a very philosophical topic, but it is also inescapably tied to the practical.

Let’s be clear right up front. I think many people, myself included, often fall into believing the idea that “private transportation system” means “cars” while “public transportation system” means “trains and subways.” This is not correct. For example, although the cars themselves are privately owned, the interstate highway system is most definitely a public roadway network, while much of the tracks that make up the Northeast Corridor are owned by the private, albeit heavily subsidized, company Amtrak.

The very nature of Amtrak as a publically-funded, for-profit corporation brings to light another interesting fact related to our topic – namely that in the vast majority of cases, transportation systems are not strictly “public” or “private,” but rather some combination of the two. The question, then, is truly not, “Should the government be involved in the transportation sector?”, but rather, “To what extent should the government be involved in the transportation sector?” What role should the government play? What should be its responsibilities? Hard to definitively answer – but interesting to think about.

The question of public vs. private is especially interesting due to recent events in Washington. Congress, along with the American people as a whole, is very much divided on the issue of the role of government, especially in the areas of economic and fiscal policy. As alluded to above, the recent standoff between conservatives and liberals regarding government spending and taxation lead to the budget cuts known as the sequester. In addition, as one ASCE blogger points out, “Congress will need to pass another continuing resolution (CR) before March 27 to keep the federal government funded.” Although this bill will almost certainly be passed, it is unclear what provisions it will contain with regard to new or maintained government spending on transportation. On top of all this, the federal government is expected to reach its debt ceiling (again!) by May of this year.

What does all of this have to do with transportation systems? Very simply, it takes a lot of money to construct and maintain a transportation system. At this point in time, the US federal government does not have a lot of money to spend on, well, anything really.

So we’re confronted with this problem, and several solutions present themselves.

  • Option 1: Enlarge the role of the federal government. Increase centralized planning, raise taxes, and encourage certain modes of transportation over others as a way to shape the future of the transportation system.
  • Option 2: Give the states more power over their respective transportation systems. (Note: This is similar to our current system.) Or, go even further and give more power to local authorities.
  • Option 3: Privatize the transportation system. Encourage companies to construct new infrastructure or take over responsibility for existing infrastructure using financial incentives or by decreasing existing regulations.
  • Option 4: Push Public-Private Partnerships. Invest in the development of a publically-subsidized, privately-run transportation system. The degree of privatization can vary to meet the needs of the area.

Each of these options has pro’s and con’s. In general, they are tied to the two extremes of entirely public vs. fully private.

An entirely public system gets its strength from its centralization. The government has (at least the potential for) more capital than private firms, and can therefore invest in large projects designed to meet future needs. In addition, it can more easily obtain the land needed for a project through the use of eminent domain. The government can also plan a uniform system for a large area, and is more able to plan around needs, rather than practically limiting constraints.

Despite all of its advantages, public systems have their fair share of problems. Government-managed programs are notoriously slow and not especially cost-effective. Because of the high levels of bureaucracy often present in government projects and the lack of financial pressure, there is often a lack of challenging, defined goals, insightful and revolutionary ideas, and visionary leadership. In a sense, too much oversight breeds a lack of effective oversight.

Private systems have their own challenges and drawbacks. Transportation systems, by their nature, call for extensive organizational and technological unity. If a transportation system is too decentralized, without any major players, it cannot adequately perform its primary function of effectively moving people and goods from point to point. For example, think of medieval Germany, where a trip up the Rhine involved stopping every few miles to pay a toll to some feudal lord (robber baron) in return for the right to pass through his section of river. Or, consider the many cases in which two transportation systems are geographically very close, but not connected due to poor planning and a lack of oversight. Increased financial concerns also mean that private companies may be hesitant to take on projects that are necessary to society, but may not be able to generate enough revenue to be self-sustaining or profitable. In addition, critics suggest that lack of government oversight may result in the endangerment of public welfare due to the implementation of cost-cutting measures.

Despite these drawbacks, private systems have a host of advantages over public ones. A private company’s efficiency in managing financial resources, manpower, and project time-scales is probably the greatest advantage of such an enterprise over its public counterpart. In addition, although the government has vast resources available to it for large-scale planning, private firms are generally more in-tune to the actual needs of society because they closely monitor the market, which is a rather good indicator of society’s needs and/or wants. While the government may have “experts” that can make recommendations (be they good or not) about what will be good for society as a whole and in the long run, for-profit companies do an excellent job at determining what society wants, and meeting that desire. Plus, as an added bonus, taxes decrease.

In many cases, the best option is to blend the two extremes of public and private. The exact organization can be determined on a case-by-case basis in order to maximize the benefits of each, while avoiding the drawbacks. Public-Private Partnerships may take a variety of forms. The system organization used perhaps most commonly in the US features government-subsidized companies responsible for system maintenance and operation. For example, many train, subway, and bus systems are operated by heavily-subsidized for-profit companies. However, in other cases, political opposition prevents the implementation of such systems. For example, efforts to turn control of the Pennsylvania Turnpike over to a private company failed when it was revealed that the company being considered (because it had the most competitive bid) was foreign-based.

All told, the question of public vs. private is not an easy one. Many complex factors are involved, both practical and philosophical. However, it is a question that demands an answer one way or another. If no answer is intentionally and specifically given by society, the government, and private companies, the result will be the continuation of the status quo. Fortunately, in our society, we as citizens and consumers have a say in deciding the future of our transportation system. So, if you want to change something, work to make it happen.






847 thoughts on “Should Transportation Systems Be Public Or Private?

  1. با خرید بلیط هواپیما تهران استانبول از سایت تیک بان به راحتی می توانید یکی از ارزان ترین بلیط هواپیما خارجی را خریداری کنید. پیشنهادات قیمتی در ایرلاین های مختلف متفاوت است اما می توانید با انتخاب کلاس پروازی ارزان و مناسب سفر راحتی را تجربه کنید. در همین سایت می توانید بلیط هواپیما استانبول را رزرو کنید. خطوط هوایی ترکیه و اطلس جهانی از جمله ایرلاین هایی هستند که پروازهای مستقیم بریتانیا به استانبول را ارائه می‌ دهند.

  2. Hi there,

    Very nice post and blog, I found it very explanatory and informative, thank you very much for sharing your knowledge and wisdom with us.

    take care and stay positive

    Your follower

    Lisa from Middle Names ideias and also find out the meaning of names.


  3. 如果personal statement写作中什么都想不出来怎么办?
    《个人陈述》是一篇杂乱无章的文章,内容是申请人在美国、加拿大和英国等西方国家申请大学/研究生入学时自行撰写的。如果您在personal statement代写 中想不出任何东西怎么办?我缺乏经验和见解,我的个性与我的专业无关。现在,还有最后一步。直接清楚地说出您的申请目的。越简洁越好。相反,它能给人留下高效、干练的印象。简单的风格也是一个不错的选择。我们还有一个不成熟的建议:如果您不能把握开头,您不妨先写其他部分,然后再写开头。这是非常有效的。在写作过程中,您会慢慢澄清您的想法。当您知道自己写了什么,灵感就会来。

  4. ST52
    ورق فولادی که از بیلت یا تختال تولید می‌شود، در ساخت قوطی و پروفیل و انواع لوله‌ها به‌کار بُرده می‌شوند. ورق فولادی قیمت ورق St52 با دو شیوه‌ی نورد گرم و سرد تولید می‌شود. ورق‌های نورد گرم که ورق سیاه نیز نام دارند، دارای درجات و مقاومت‌های متفاوتی هستند. یکی از انواع ورق‌های سیاه که ورق ST52 نام دارد،.

  5. آنچه در ساخت و سازها اهمیت دارد مقاومت و استحکام بالای آن ها اسا. قیمت تیراهن را در این سایت می توانید هر روز مشاهده کرده و آن را با دیگر مراجع و منابع مقایسه کنید. اسکلت بندی سازه با استفاده از تیرهای اصلی فرعی در انواع استاندارد و اندازه و کارخانه های مختلف به شما در این امر کمک می کند.

    • پرتغال غربی‌ترین کشور سرزمین اصلی اروپاست و خاک پرتغال به همراه تنها همسایه خود اسپانیا شبه‌جزیره ایبری را تشکیل می‌دهد. گلدن ویزای پرتغال پرتغال از سوی غرب به اقیانوس اطلس محدود شده‌است و دو مجمع‌الجزایر آزور و مادیرا واقع در این اقیانوس نیز جزء خاک پرتغال هستند.

  6. 27-year-old Ookado Akiha who vows to stay single, gets a proposal to enter into a fake marriage from 30-year-old Momose Shuu who wants to get the status of a married man for some reason.

  7. ام جم فروشگاه خرید محصولات درون برنامه ای اعم از سی پی کالاف دیوتی موبایل ، جم فری فایر و همینطور خرید گیفت کارت های معتبر می باشد که سعی داشته است سفارشات را در سریعترین زمان تحویل مشتریان عزیز دهد. با ام جم به آسانی می توانید انواع جم و گیفت کارت در هر زمینه ای که نیاز دارید را تهیه کنید .

  8. Public transportation system will be more easier and comfortable to manage the traffic control system. I have been working as senior advisor and help people with the where people could get connected with wonderful girls and women around the world. By the way, private vehicles and private transportation could be the reasons of being traffic jam in the road.

  9. همانطور که دانستیم عملکرد درست و سلامتی درخت گردو به عوامل بسیار زیادی وابسته است. که برخی از آنها متوجه نهالستان بوده و برخی دیگر به باغدار مرتبط است. نهالستان معتبر وظیفه دارد نهال با کیفیت و سالم به باغداران ارائه دهد. اما انتخاب درست نهال گردو و پرورش صحیح آن، به باغدار بستگی دارد. باغداران قبل‌از خرید، باید حتما فاکتورهای تاثیرگذار در انتخاب بهترین رقم گردو را بررسی نمایند. و نهال خود را براساس شرایط فعلی باغ خود خریداری کنند. سپس به پرورش صحیح آن بپردازند. یکی از مهم ترین نکات در پرورش درخت گردو آبیاری و کوددهی و سمپاشی درخت است. که اگر به درستی انجام شود درختان قادرند به حداکثر عملکرد خود برسند.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *