Should Transportation Systems Be Public Or Private?

In light of the recent sequester in Washington, I thought it might be interesting to think a little about the relationship between transportation systems and public policy. To what extent should the government manage and fund the design, operation, and maintenance of transportation systems? In one sense, it is a very philosophical topic, but it is also inescapably tied to the practical.

Let’s be clear right up front. I think many people, myself included, often fall into believing the idea that “private transportation system” means “cars” while “public transportation system” means “trains and subways.” This is not correct. For example, although the cars themselves are privately owned, the interstate highway system is most definitely a public roadway network, while much of the tracks that make up the Northeast Corridor are owned by the private, albeit heavily subsidized, company Amtrak.

The very nature of Amtrak as a publically-funded, for-profit corporation brings to light another interesting fact related to our topic – namely that in the vast majority of cases, transportation systems are not strictly “public” or “private,” but rather some combination of the two. The question, then, is truly not, “Should the government be involved in the transportation sector?”, but rather, “To what extent should the government be involved in the transportation sector?” What role should the government play? What should be its responsibilities? Hard to definitively answer – but interesting to think about.

The question of public vs. private is especially interesting due to recent events in Washington. Congress, along with the American people as a whole, is very much divided on the issue of the role of government, especially in the areas of economic and fiscal policy. As alluded to above, the recent standoff between conservatives and liberals regarding government spending and taxation lead to the budget cuts known as the sequester. In addition, as one ASCE blogger points out, “Congress will need to pass another continuing resolution (CR) before March 27 to keep the federal government funded.” Although this bill will almost certainly be passed, it is unclear what provisions it will contain with regard to new or maintained government spending on transportation. On top of all this, the federal government is expected to reach its debt ceiling (again!) by May of this year.

What does all of this have to do with transportation systems? Very simply, it takes a lot of money to construct and maintain a transportation system. At this point in time, the US federal government does not have a lot of money to spend on, well, anything really.

So we’re confronted with this problem, and several solutions present themselves.

  • Option 1: Enlarge the role of the federal government. Increase centralized planning, raise taxes, and encourage certain modes of transportation over others as a way to shape the future of the transportation system.
  • Option 2: Give the states more power over their respective transportation systems. (Note: This is similar to our current system.) Or, go even further and give more power to local authorities.
  • Option 3: Privatize the transportation system. Encourage companies to construct new infrastructure or take over responsibility for existing infrastructure using financial incentives or by decreasing existing regulations.
  • Option 4: Push Public-Private Partnerships. Invest in the development of a publically-subsidized, privately-run transportation system. The degree of privatization can vary to meet the needs of the area.

Each of these options has pro’s and con’s. In general, they are tied to the two extremes of entirely public vs. fully private.

An entirely public system gets its strength from its centralization. The government has (at least the potential for) more capital than private firms, and can therefore invest in large projects designed to meet future needs. In addition, it can more easily obtain the land needed for a project through the use of eminent domain. The government can also plan a uniform system for a large area, and is more able to plan around needs, rather than practically limiting constraints.

Despite all of its advantages, public systems have their fair share of problems. Government-managed programs are notoriously slow and not especially cost-effective. Because of the high levels of bureaucracy often present in government projects and the lack of financial pressure, there is often a lack of challenging, defined goals, insightful and revolutionary ideas, and visionary leadership. In a sense, too much oversight breeds a lack of effective oversight.

Private systems have their own challenges and drawbacks. Transportation systems, by their nature, call for extensive organizational and technological unity. If a transportation system is too decentralized, without any major players, it cannot adequately perform its primary function of effectively moving people and goods from point to point. For example, think of medieval Germany, where a trip up the Rhine involved stopping every few miles to pay a toll to some feudal lord (robber baron) in return for the right to pass through his section of river. Or, consider the many cases in which two transportation systems are geographically very close, but not connected due to poor planning and a lack of oversight. Increased financial concerns also mean that private companies may be hesitant to take on projects that are necessary to society, but may not be able to generate enough revenue to be self-sustaining or profitable. In addition, critics suggest that lack of government oversight may result in the endangerment of public welfare due to the implementation of cost-cutting measures.

Despite these drawbacks, private systems have a host of advantages over public ones. A private company’s efficiency in managing financial resources, manpower, and project time-scales is probably the greatest advantage of such an enterprise over its public counterpart. In addition, although the government has vast resources available to it for large-scale planning, private firms are generally more in-tune to the actual needs of society because they closely monitor the market, which is a rather good indicator of society’s needs and/or wants. While the government may have “experts” that can make recommendations (be they good or not) about what will be good for society as a whole and in the long run, for-profit companies do an excellent job at determining what society wants, and meeting that desire. Plus, as an added bonus, taxes decrease.

In many cases, the best option is to blend the two extremes of public and private. The exact organization can be determined on a case-by-case basis in order to maximize the benefits of each, while avoiding the drawbacks. Public-Private Partnerships may take a variety of forms. The system organization used perhaps most commonly in the US features government-subsidized companies responsible for system maintenance and operation. For example, many train, subway, and bus systems are operated by heavily-subsidized for-profit companies. However, in other cases, political opposition prevents the implementation of such systems. For example, efforts to turn control of the Pennsylvania Turnpike over to a private company failed when it was revealed that the company being considered (because it had the most competitive bid) was foreign-based.

All told, the question of public vs. private is not an easy one. Many complex factors are involved, both practical and philosophical. However, it is a question that demands an answer one way or another. If no answer is intentionally and specifically given by society, the government, and private companies, the result will be the continuation of the status quo. Fortunately, in our society, we as citizens and consumers have a say in deciding the future of our transportation system. So, if you want to change something, work to make it happen.

 

 

———————————————————————————————————————

 

 

http://blogs.asce.org/govrel/2013/03/11/continuing-resolution-puts-transportation-funds-at-risk/

http://www.nffe.org/local2109/ht/display/ArticleDetails/i/63500

http://reason.com/blog/2012/09/27/study-public-transportation-can-succeed

http://www.virginiadot.org/business/ppta-default.asp

http://www.mysanantonio.com/opinion/commentary/article/Congress-should-embrace-public-private-3645792.php

http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-the-difference-between-private-and-public-transportation.htm

http://kfarr.com/2008/07/10/when-should-public-transportation-systems-be-private/

http://reason.org/news/show/does-bus-transit-reduce-greenhouse

http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/p3/index.htm

http://www.inthepublicinterest.org/case/pennsylvania-turnpike

 

 

730 thoughts on “Should Transportation Systems Be Public Or Private?

    • become-addicted-by-consuming-opium-several-times
      توسعه تجارت مواد اعتیاد آور که هرساله زندگی تعداد زیادی از مصرف کنندگان را به ورطه نابودی میکشاند، با چند بار مصرف تریاک معتاد میشویم ؟ میتواند بزرگترین و ترسناک ترین تهدید برای تمام جوامع بشری باشد، تریاک قدیمی ترین و مشهورترین مخدری است که بسیار اعتیاد آور بوده و اکثریت از عوارض کشیدن تریاک با سیخ و یا تزریق آن بی اطلاع هستند

  1. I Am Celina.Ines De Ramon.After going over a few of the articles on your site,
    I really like your way of blogging. I added it to my bookmark webpage list and will be checking back in the near future.
    Please check out my website as well and tell me how you feel. This is a really amazing blog that provides quality information. I Daily Visit To Read This Blog Posts. This Website Is All About The Facts Of Great And Valuable Information. Thanks So Much For Sharing Such And Amazing Information With Us.

  2. This is the right site for anyone who wants to understand this topic. You understand a whole lot its almost hard to argue with you (not that I really will need to…HaHa). You certainly put a new spin on a topic that’s been discussed for many years. Excellent stuff, just great.

  3. I found so many interesting stuff in your blog especially its discussion. From the tons of comments on your articles, I guess I am not the only one having all the enjoyment here! keep up the good work

  4. Hey How Are You Admin.Sofie Mills. I Am From Singapore and I Really Like To Read Your Blog Post And I Daily Visit For This Such An Amazing And Valuable Information. This Blog Is Full Of Valuable And Amazing Content. This Blog Is All About The Facts Of Excellent Information Which You Provide. I Thankful To You For Sharing Amazing And Unique Content On Your Web Blog.

  5. املاک لاهیجان در ابتدا با هدف ایجاد محیطی آنلاین برای خریداران و فروشندگان عزیز بوجود آمد که در این شرایط کرونای موجود در ایران بتوانند از طریق اینترنت ملک مورد نظر خود را پیدا کنند اعم از : خرید ویلا ساحلی َ خرید ویلا چمخاله َ خرید زمین ساحلی َ خرید زمین لاهیجان و .. ملکی اعم از خرید و فروش ، رهن و اجاره کلیه انواع ملک بصورت تخصصی و حرفه ای برای مشتریان عزیز راه اندازی گردید .

  6. Price action trading is a methodology for financial market speculation which consists of the analysis of basic price movement across time. It’s used by many retail traders and often by institutional traders and hedge fund managers to make predictions on the future direction of the price of a security or financial market.

  7. Voir ou Revoir la Vidéo intégrale [HD 720p] en Replay Streaming et téléchargement gratuit, Diffusé le Jeudi 21 janvier 2021 à 17h25 sur TF1. Découvrir ou Voir l’intégralité
    Thanks for your good site
    buzzmonclick

  8. برچسب های برش خورده یا قالب دار معمولاً شکل یا طرح کلی منحصر به فردی دارند که به صورت سفارشی ساخته می شوند. برش قالب فرآیندی است که از قالب و پرس برای برش دادن اشکال سفارشی استفاده می کند. چاپ لیبل های برش خورده معمولاً برای نام تجاری یا سایر اهداف زیبایی شکل متمایزی به وجود می‌آورد. آنها همچنین برای ظروف ، بسته بندی یا صفحه های برچسب منحصر به فرد استفاده می شوند.

  9. شرکت انتقال امواج نوری برنا تولید کننده تجهیزات مخابراتی، اجرای سیستم های مخابراتی و ارتباطی و حفاظتی است

  10. read
    بلبرینگ KYK بطور کلي بار وارده بر انواع رولبرينگ ها و بلبرينگ ها به دو صورت شعاعي (radial) ومحوري (thrust) مي باشد و بسته به موقعيت و شرايطي که بلبرينگ مورد استفاده قرار مي گيرد يکي از اين دو بار ويا هردو بار بر آن وارد مي شوند.در مواقعي که فشار از نوع شعاعي باشد، مي توان از رولبرينگ ها استفاده کرد، زيرا رولبرينگ ها در برابر اين نوع بارها بسيار مقاوم اند و درصورتي که هردو بار شعاعي و محوري وارد شود، از بلبرينگ ها مي توان استفاده کرد.تفاوت اصلي رولبرينگ و بلبرينگ در مقاومت آنها در برابر انواع بارهاي وارده است.

  11. یکی از بزرگترین مزایای تردمیل شیائومی آن است که به سادگی جمع می شود و راه اندازی آن بسیار ساده می باشد و علاوه بر آن فضای بسیار کمی از خانه یا محل کار شما را به خود اختصاص می دهد و همانند تردمیل های غول آسا جلوه غیر دلنشینی به محیط اتاق یا خانه شما نمی دهد و در نهایت باید گفت تمام بهانه های موجود برای پیاده روی نکردن را از شما خواهد گرفت!

  12. سایت ساز سی فایو یک سایت ساز ایرانی است که با قدرتمند‌ترین هسته طراحی سایت حرفه ای را دارد. شما می توانید به راحتی هر سایتی را که دوست دارید در کمترین زمان با قیمتی مناسب طراحی کنید و از امکانات تخصصی وردپرس بهره مند شوید.

  13. .سایت ساز سی فایو ارائه دهنده خدمات گسترده ای در حوزه طراحی سایت در سریع ترین زمان ممکن است است
    طراحی و ساخت وب سایت و فروشگاه آنلاین بدون کدنویسی به کمک سی فایو امکان پذیر است.

    https://see5.net/

  14. Thank you for your article of transportation systems. I don’t know much about it, but I think all engenieers will find your article useful. In order for more of these people to read your review, I advise you to post it on Instagram, and use the services of https://viplikes.net/ to quickly increase the number of subscribers.

  15. قطعا مزیت بارز استفاده از رینگ اسپرت ایجاد ظاهری متفاوت و زیباتردر خودرو می‌باشد. اما استفاده از انواع رینگ های الومینیومی استاندارد مزیت های فنی زیادی دارد که در لینک زیر به مهمترین آنها پرداخته شده است:
    https://1car.ir/ns-17936

  16. این مقاله به طور کلی در مورد وب سایت خرید کاندوم ها است. برای دامنه اینترنت. وب سایت تم تولد، به لیست دامنه های لوازم تولد سطح بالای اینترنت مراجعه کنید .
    با WebCite اشتباه کاندوم گرفته نشود.

    https://ai-kala.ir/Links to an external site.

     

    usap.gov وب سایت

  17. ملات ساختمانی ماده ای چسبنده و خمیری شکل است که در حوزه ساخت و ساز کاربرد فراوانی دارد. ملات برای چسباندن مصالح گوناگون به یکدیگر به کار می رود. این ماده، مرکب از باملات دو جزء اصلی پر کننده و چسباننده است که بیشترین درصد حجم آن را ماده پر کننده تشکیل داده و ماده چسباننده حجم کمی را به خود اختصاص می دهد.

  18. am vitamins was created to help people in their health goal journey. We have set the standard in the nutritional supplement industry by offering the best brands and widest range of products in beauty, vitamins, nutrition, fitness, digestion, herbs & natural remedies, super-foods & groceries, and many more.We provide affordable nutrition am vitamins and am supplements on the same brand you know and love. We thrive on being green and want to help people on finding supplements that are all herbal and natural.

  19. رسائل صباح الخير والنصوص صباح الخير الجميلة لخلق الطاقة والنشاط في بداية اليوم مهمة ومفيدة للغاية ، خاصة في هذه الفترة الزمنية التي يكون فيها الجميع مشغولين بحياتهم وعملهم وليس لديهم علاقة تذكر مع بعضهم البعض. إرسال رسالة جميلة رسالة صباح الخير يمكن أن تساعد القرب من الناس. اقرأ أجمل الجملات عن صباح الخیر ونصوص خاصة صباح الخير الدافع لامتلاك الطاقة والدافع في بداية الصباح وبداية اليوم في مقالاتنا.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *