Should Transportation Systems Be Public Or Private?

In light of the recent sequester in Washington, I thought it might be interesting to think a little about the relationship between transportation systems and public policy. To what extent should the government manage and fund the design, operation, and maintenance of transportation systems? In one sense, it is a very philosophical topic, but it is also inescapably tied to the practical.

Let’s be clear right up front. I think many people, myself included, often fall into believing the idea that “private transportation system” means “cars” while “public transportation system” means “trains and subways.” This is not correct. For example, although the cars themselves are privately owned, the interstate highway system is most definitely a public roadway network, while much of the tracks that make up the Northeast Corridor are owned by the private, albeit heavily subsidized, company Amtrak.

The very nature of Amtrak as a publically-funded, for-profit corporation brings to light another interesting fact related to our topic – namely that in the vast majority of cases, transportation systems are not strictly “public” or “private,” but rather some combination of the two. The question, then, is truly not, “Should the government be involved in the transportation sector?”, but rather, “To what extent should the government be involved in the transportation sector?” What role should the government play? What should be its responsibilities? Hard to definitively answer – but interesting to think about.

The question of public vs. private is especially interesting due to recent events in Washington. Congress, along with the American people as a whole, is very much divided on the issue of the role of government, especially in the areas of economic and fiscal policy. As alluded to above, the recent standoff between conservatives and liberals regarding government spending and taxation lead to the budget cuts known as the sequester. In addition, as one ASCE blogger points out, “Congress will need to pass another continuing resolution (CR) before March 27 to keep the federal government funded.” Although this bill will almost certainly be passed, it is unclear what provisions it will contain with regard to new or maintained government spending on transportation. On top of all this, the federal government is expected to reach its debt ceiling (again!) by May of this year.

What does all of this have to do with transportation systems? Very simply, it takes a lot of money to construct and maintain a transportation system. At this point in time, the US federal government does not have a lot of money to spend on, well, anything really.

So we’re confronted with this problem, and several solutions present themselves.

  • Option 1: Enlarge the role of the federal government. Increase centralized planning, raise taxes, and encourage certain modes of transportation over others as a way to shape the future of the transportation system.
  • Option 2: Give the states more power over their respective transportation systems. (Note: This is similar to our current system.) Or, go even further and give more power to local authorities.
  • Option 3: Privatize the transportation system. Encourage companies to construct new infrastructure or take over responsibility for existing infrastructure using financial incentives or by decreasing existing regulations.
  • Option 4: Push Public-Private Partnerships. Invest in the development of a publically-subsidized, privately-run transportation system. The degree of privatization can vary to meet the needs of the area.

Each of these options has pro’s and con’s. In general, they are tied to the two extremes of entirely public vs. fully private.

An entirely public system gets its strength from its centralization. The government has (at least the potential for) more capital than private firms, and can therefore invest in large projects designed to meet future needs. In addition, it can more easily obtain the land needed for a project through the use of eminent domain. The government can also plan a uniform system for a large area, and is more able to plan around needs, rather than practically limiting constraints.

Despite all of its advantages, public systems have their fair share of problems. Government-managed programs are notoriously slow and not especially cost-effective. Because of the high levels of bureaucracy often present in government projects and the lack of financial pressure, there is often a lack of challenging, defined goals, insightful and revolutionary ideas, and visionary leadership. In a sense, too much oversight breeds a lack of effective oversight.

Private systems have their own challenges and drawbacks. Transportation systems, by their nature, call for extensive organizational and technological unity. If a transportation system is too decentralized, without any major players, it cannot adequately perform its primary function of effectively moving people and goods from point to point. For example, think of medieval Germany, where a trip up the Rhine involved stopping every few miles to pay a toll to some feudal lord (robber baron) in return for the right to pass through his section of river. Or, consider the many cases in which two transportation systems are geographically very close, but not connected due to poor planning and a lack of oversight. Increased financial concerns also mean that private companies may be hesitant to take on projects that are necessary to society, but may not be able to generate enough revenue to be self-sustaining or profitable. In addition, critics suggest that lack of government oversight may result in the endangerment of public welfare due to the implementation of cost-cutting measures.

Despite these drawbacks, private systems have a host of advantages over public ones. A private company’s efficiency in managing financial resources, manpower, and project time-scales is probably the greatest advantage of such an enterprise over its public counterpart. In addition, although the government has vast resources available to it for large-scale planning, private firms are generally more in-tune to the actual needs of society because they closely monitor the market, which is a rather good indicator of society’s needs and/or wants. While the government may have “experts” that can make recommendations (be they good or not) about what will be good for society as a whole and in the long run, for-profit companies do an excellent job at determining what society wants, and meeting that desire. Plus, as an added bonus, taxes decrease.

In many cases, the best option is to blend the two extremes of public and private. The exact organization can be determined on a case-by-case basis in order to maximize the benefits of each, while avoiding the drawbacks. Public-Private Partnerships may take a variety of forms. The system organization used perhaps most commonly in the US features government-subsidized companies responsible for system maintenance and operation. For example, many train, subway, and bus systems are operated by heavily-subsidized for-profit companies. However, in other cases, political opposition prevents the implementation of such systems. For example, efforts to turn control of the Pennsylvania Turnpike over to a private company failed when it was revealed that the company being considered (because it had the most competitive bid) was foreign-based.

All told, the question of public vs. private is not an easy one. Many complex factors are involved, both practical and philosophical. However, it is a question that demands an answer one way or another. If no answer is intentionally and specifically given by society, the government, and private companies, the result will be the continuation of the status quo. Fortunately, in our society, we as citizens and consumers have a say in deciding the future of our transportation system. So, if you want to change something, work to make it happen.

 

 

———————————————————————————————————————

 

 

http://blogs.asce.org/govrel/2013/03/11/continuing-resolution-puts-transportation-funds-at-risk/

http://www.nffe.org/local2109/ht/display/ArticleDetails/i/63500

http://reason.com/blog/2012/09/27/study-public-transportation-can-succeed

http://www.virginiadot.org/business/ppta-default.asp

http://www.mysanantonio.com/opinion/commentary/article/Congress-should-embrace-public-private-3645792.php

http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-the-difference-between-private-and-public-transportation.htm

http://kfarr.com/2008/07/10/when-should-public-transportation-systems-be-private/

http://reason.org/news/show/does-bus-transit-reduce-greenhouse

http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/p3/index.htm

http://www.inthepublicinterest.org/case/pennsylvania-turnpike

 

 

2,970 thoughts on “Should Transportation Systems Be Public Or Private?

  1. میلگرد‌ها میله‌هایی بلند هستند که از جنس فولاد ساخته شده و سایزهای گوناگونی دارند. قیمت تیرآهن 14 فایکو تولید میلگرد هم به صورت ساده و هم به صورت آجدار انجام می شود. میلگردهای ساختمانی عموما از نوع آج دار هستند.

  2. Повезло вам учиться в этом удивительном вузе. Пожалуй, сверхсовременные аудитории, спортивные залы, замечательную практику, студенты имеют насыщенную жизнь вместе с учебой. То есть, есть все для тех, кто стремится заниматься научной деятельностью в дальнейшем.

  3. Sokak stilinin değişen ve evrilen doğası, modayı eğlenceli ve dinamik kılar. Oversize giyim ve şalvar pantolonlar gibi modern unsurlar, sokak modasını taze ve canlı tutar. Eğer bu trendlere uygun giyimler arıyorsanız, https://gerusta.com/ adresini ziyaret etmelisiniz.

  4. Sebelum pendaftaran akun atau bermain dengan melakukan setoran modal asli, Anda sebaiknya memahami lebih dalam tentang situs tejo123 online dengan mengkaji lebih luas cara dan teknik yang tepat dalam menemukan game di indonesia.

  5. محلول التراسونیک یک مایع است که برای استفاده در شوینده های التراسونیک طراحی شده است. این محلول ها به طور معمول حاوی مواد شوینده، حلال ها و سایر مواد افزودنی هستند که به پاکسازی موثر قطعات کمک می کنند.

  6. İşletmenizin çevrimiçi varlığını güçlendirmek, müşterilerinizi etkilemek ve rekabetin önünde olmak istiyorsanız, İstinyeWeb.com size yardımcı olabilir. Profesyonel ve kullanıcı dostu web tasarımından SEO hizmetlerine kadar bir dizi önemli çevrimiçi hizmet sunuyoruz.

  7. I’ve perused the thorough content of your blog. Representing “Ddivi,” we wish to convey our profound appreciation for your significant contribution. You can reach us at “mobile welding company“. We truly value the exceptional quality of your content and commend your dedication to the blog.

  8. Trabzon, Türkiye’nin kuzeydoğusunda Karadeniz’e kıyısı olan tarihi ve güzel bir şehirdir. Hem ticaretin hem de yaşamın merkezi olarak önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Taşınma süreçleri, Trabzon’un dinamik yapısında sık sık karşımıza çıkar ve Trabzon nakliyat firmaları, bu süreci kolaylaştırmak ve güvenli bir şekilde eşyalarınızı taşımak için önemli bir role sahiptir.

    Web: https://www.trabzonnakliyatcim.com/

  9. بازی انفجار بت کلونی یکی از محبوب ترین بازی های کازینو آنلاین می باشد. نام دیگر این بازی crash است. توجه داشته باشید که اگر میخواهید وارد این بازی شوید باید مواردی مانند طمع کردن را در مرحله اول کنار بگذارید. این بازی جزء سود آورترین بازی ها می باشد و شما در آن میتوانید با کمی تجربه و تنها با چند کلیک ساده درآمد بالایی داشته باشید.

  10. Basic SEO Web Stats at Your Fingertips
    Our tool provides a comprehensive overview of basic SEO statistics, including Google’s top tips for crafting compelling title links, expert advice for successful SEO strategies, and essential best practices. From understanding the basics of search engine optimization to maximizing your online presence through SEO, we’ve got you covered.
    Reference: https://www.thesiterank.com/

  11. AV핫걸
    Повезло вам учиться в этом удивительном вузе. Пожалуй, сверхсовременные аудитории, спортивные залы, замечательную практику, студенты имеют насыщенную жизнь вместе с учебой

  12. گردشگری خروجی یا برون‌مرزی (Outbound tourism) گردشگری برون‌مرزی، زمانی است که شما از کشور خود به کشور دیگری می‌روید. همان مثال قبلی را در نظر بگیرید، یعنی شما قصد دارید از ایران به اسپانیا سفر کنید، در این حالت این گردشگری خروجی برای ایران حساب می‌شود، زیرا شما در حال ترک این کشور هستید.گردشگری برون‌مرزی هم شکلی از سفرهای بین‌المللی است تور 7 روزه تایلند و مجموعه از الزامات رسمی خود را دارد که باید آنها را رعایت کنید. آژانس‌های مسافرتی باعث راحت‌تر شدن این فرایند می‌شوند.

  13. Bimaspin dikenal akan kemudahannya dalam mengakses situs dan kelancaran dalam bertransaksi. Anda dapat dengan mudah untuk melakukan pendaftaran hingga bertransaksi, dan bisa dipastikan Anda bisa bermain dengan sangat nyaman dan tentu saja bisa mendapatkan kemenangan besar.

  14. Kunjungi situs resmi RADEN138 dan segera lakukan pendaftaran akunnya. Mulai dari scatter dan maxwin sudah dijamin bisa Anda peroleh hanya dengan memainkan satu akun gacor saja, klaim langsung fitur baru kami untuk menjamin kemenangan akun Anda. Dijamin terekomendasi dan menyenangkan untuk dimainkan.

  15. Susu88 adalah salah satu situs permainan online yang sudah berdiri sejak 2015 lalu. Tentunya dapat anda mainkan dengan uang asli sudah bisa menikmati semua permainan yang tersedia di dalam situs.

  16. PLUMÓN CON CERTIFICADO RDSLa certificación Estándar para un Uso Responsable del Plumón (RDS, por sus siglas en inglés) garantiza que nuestro relleno de chaqueta the north face plumón natural de ganso es de origen ético, se ha producido de forma responsable y su trazabilidad se puede verificar. El plumón es el mejor aislante del mundo en términos de relación calidez/

  17. In my opinion, a public transportation system ensures accessibility and inclusivity for everyone. It’s a shared resource that benefits the entire community, promoting sustainability and reducing traffic congestion. Let’s invest in public transport for a greener and more connected future. Also, check Picasso App

  18. برای اندازه‌گیری غلظت خون، عمدتاً از آزمایش خون استفاده می‌شود. از کجا بدانیم غلظت خون داریم دو نوع آزمایش خون رایج برای اندازه‌گیری غلظت خون عبارتند از:آزمایش گلوکز (قند خون):
    این آزمایش برای اندازه‌گیری میزان قند (گلوکز) در خون استفاده می‌شود.
    نتایج این آزمایش به صورت میلی‌گرم بر دسی‌لیتر (mg/dL) یا میلی‌مول بر لیتر (mmol/L) اعلام می‌شود.
    برای تشخیص دیابت و نظارت بر مدیریت قند خون این آزمایش معمولاً انجام می‌شود.
    آزمایش چربی خون (لیپید پروفایل):
    این آزمایش شامل اندازه‌گیری میزان چربی‌ها مانند کلسترول کل، کلسترول LDL (ضربان ناشی از ناقلان چربی با کمترین چگالی لیپوپروتئین)، کلسترول HDL (ضربان ناشی از ناقلان چربی با بیشترین چگالی لیپوپروتئین) و تری‌گلیسریدها می‌شود.
    نتایج این آزمایش نیز به صورت میلی‌گرم بر دسی‌لیتر (mg/dL) اعلام می‌شود.

  19. Susu88 sekarang bisa melakukan pendaftaran akun, hanya dengan mendaftarkan satu user ID gacor saja. Dapatkan kemenangan besar di situs. Jangan sampai ketinggalan hadiahnya, setiap member berhak untuk mendapatkan hadiah spesial dari situs resmi Susu88. Dijamin terekomendasi dan menyenangkan untuk dimainkan.

  20. Print Shop London
    In the bustling heart of London, Large Print London stands out as the premier choice for affordable same-day printing needs. We cater to a diverse range of business and personal requirements with precision and efficiency. Open 24/7, even on bank holidays, our commitment to excellence ensures that your print demands, be it banners for events, documents for business, or custom garments, are met promptly without compromising on quality. Whether it’s last-minute presentations or event materials, trust Large Print London to deliver every time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *