Identifying the Self through IDs

In the third chapter of her book, Karen Strassler discusses the role of the identification photograph and how this impacted Java and its culture and history. Not only did the governments obsession with identification cards cause an expansion in the photography realm, but they also impacted the local communities and created a new form of history whereby people could use the photos in family rituals and to have a closer connection to the past. “But as these projects were generalised and normalised, I argue, the identity photograph became a widespread idiomatic shorthand for citizenship or legitimate belonging in the state-authorised national community.” Here, the author is showing that as this process became normalized throughout the culture, a new historical narrative was being created and the concept of identity was now largely embraced and maintaining through photographic evidence. 

While reading this, I was reminded of the lecture our class attended by Professor Lyon Barco on “Capturing the Sacred: American Photography and Mexican Farmworkers”. His lecture showed how the use of photography was able to depict how life was for many people, but also the ways in which photographs can display a certain image that the photography wanted his audience to see. Strassler’s book linked to this notion of heritage and historical narrative by emphasising the important role of visual history and how this sense allows us to have a personal attachment to a photograph and how we perceive it. Reflecting on these experiences, I began to think of my own interactions with identification cards. I am not an American citizen, but on a daily basis if I am asked to show some from of identification, I will always present my American driving license over my British one. Both are just as valid as the other, but I have assumed a new identity by coming over to this country, and I almost feel more comfortable presenting the American license over the British as I am less likely to be questioned about it and have to reveal personal information. I had personally never even thought about why I value the American one over the British, but now i can see that each identification card holds a different identity, made up of different experiences and interactions with people. It is interesting to see the relationship between my identity, and a government mandated form of identification, as before I had never thought about how the cultural influences of my daily and personal life could shape the ways I think about and use photography. 

Halbwachs Collective Memory

Halbwachs main argument appears to be that memory is a social product and that the individual memory is dependent on society. He argues that our ‘collective memories’ are influenced by the environment around us and that the collective (i.e. family, class, nation, religious identity) decides for us what is valuable to remember. “We find ourselves to be part of a group where our position is determined not by personal feelings but by rules and customs independent of us that existed before us.” (Halbwach, 55) Here, he is suggesting the collective memory not only tells the members of its community or society what they can remember, but that it is also controlling how an individual recalls a certain event and the details involved. 

I agree with Halbwachs argument that our immediate environments have the ability to influence and manipulate our memories. Humans are innately social creatures whose primary objective is to find a group or community where which they feel a sense of belonging. This neatly ties into his theory of the “collective memory” whereby our memories are a social product that depend on our relationships with other humans to be constructed in a certain way. Social interactions deeply fascinate me as I the human personality is so intricate and we are always so concerned nowadays with our identities and how we see ourselves, yet we also adjust our characterises and behaviours often depending on the group of people we are with. Do core value systems truly exist? Can something be said to represent your belief system when we can’t even be sure that we have one? Why does the construction of our identity become so fluid over time? All of these questions deeply intrigue me, and I look forward to learning more about them.