Mengele’s Skull

The main point of this article was that after investigations surrounding Josef Mengele’s supposed skeleton, the new field of forensic crime studies emerged. Now, human bodies and specifically bones were able to be used to confirm pieces of history and add to historical narratives.

“It was during the Mengele investigation that a variety of procedures and techniques in the forensic identification of human remains were professionally tests and publicly displayed, later to become available as methodologies in investigating war crimes and human rights violations.” (Page 55)

Prior to the readings this week, I had never thought about the importance that human bodies can actually play in history. When I think about sources that allow for information on the past, I automatically think of written documents, photographs, and objects. Due to the fact that the human body appears to be something that is redundant once the individual has passed, I had then assumed that once their life is over the actual importance of their body also faded. These readings, and specifically the one on Josef Mengele, have shown me that so  much can be discovered just by looking at the biological features of someone, and the physical changes that a body will experience during exposure to different treatments and acts of violence.

Bodies of Lenin

Alexei Yurchak’s article on Lenin’s body was extremely interesting. The authors main argument was that the Soviet Union used Vladimir Lenin’s body as a representation of the political values that were present during that time, and as the country developed and changed, so did the supposedly ideologies that had been put forth by Lenin while he was alive. Yurchak refers to Lenin as the “immortal body of the sovereign” (page 147), meaning that in the nations eyes, they saw Lenin to be the figure of Sovereign power, and therefore the ongoing practice of constructing, reconstructing and manipulating Lenin’s body was linked to political regime, with certain aspects of the body being hidden from the public- much like how his real  letters and thoughts towards leaders in the party were hidden from them.

“This secret approach allowed the truth of “Leninism” to appear to be the source rather than the produce of the party’s actions and policies. It also made it possible to present every new version of “Leninism” as the same, unchanging, consistent teaching of a genius, and to represent the party, to itself and others, as its unwavering implementer- not its arbitrary creator.” (Page 147)

This quote summarized the whole article for me, that his body was used as a source of power, and the context around it dictated how people reacted. While reading this piece, it made me think of Trouillot’s article on “Silencing the Past”, where sources of history are often hidden or manipulated in order to fit into a certain perspective or belief. As for Lenin, his history was being rewritten in correspondence to the political regimes in place at the time, and his true beliefs and opinions were silenced through erasing the documents of his past. I found this article extremely interesting, and it made question how I interpret every source I have access to. All information given to us is based on the context around it, which forces to interpret it in a certain way.